Inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism.

“Greater in battle

than the man who would conquer

a thousand-thousand men,

is he who would conquer

just one —

himself.

Better to conquer yourself

than others.

When you’ve trained yourself,

living in constant self-control,

neither a deva nor gandhabba,

nor a Mara banded with Brahmas,

could turn that triumph

back into defeat.”

(The Buddha, Dhammapada, verse 103 – 105).

Everyday the world, particularly TV and the news, resets my belief and my faith in defending my own people. I feel that because of WWII the world forces me to accept defeat. Because of two world wars not only do Europeans not want to conquer anymore, they do not defend themselves either. Even though Britain was on the winning side of WWII, however, the world still wants us to accept defeat. There is fear of admitting one cares about race. I think this is because governments have betrayed us and made it illegal. Making it illegal means that Europeans are doomed, as we cannot take a single action to defend ourselves without using it. I am trying to find a real and effective solution to the Holocaust. I will pray to YHWH, Jesus Christ and Gautama Buddha to help me instead of conquering the world to conquer WWII.

Conquer WWII within!

Amen.

https://conquerwwii.com

https://conquerww2.com

https://conquerwill.com


Northern attraction.

3B11014D-177F-40B6-A67E-D50CD7D80886
North Sea Empire or Anglo-Scandinavian Empire was the personal union of the kingdoms of England, Denmark and sometimes Norway for most of the period between 1013 and 1042. The raven banner was used by Cnut the Great as many various scandinavian rulers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Sea_Empire

Between Norway, Britain and Germany we could take on the world with our economy and northern attraction. Why would a Briton permanently move to and set down roots in France, Spain or Italy? We are further north so it doesn’t make sense. Considering it’s history why would any European permanently move to and set down roots in Germany? “To set down roots in Germany” is an adage or byword for a bad idea or a bad plan! Similarly, why would a Norwegian permanently move to and set down roots in Britain? They would not as they are further north. Let’s face it the north is whiter. However, obviously Southern Europeans are more than welcome to move north. This northern attraction determines that if Norway, Britain and Germany were to unite and create a North Sea Empire, then we should seat the government and capital of this hypothetical country as far north as possible, in such as Oslo. London is too far south. Britain has just left the EU, Norway is not in the EU and Germany has nothing to lose. Another note on Germany, I am about to read two books, one on the history of Norway and the other on the history of the Vikings and Norse culture, I am hoping that the Norwegians take some pride in a humble foreigner reading about their history and culture, however, I cannot say the same about Germany. Knowing what we know how can Germans take pride in a humble foreigner reading about their history? We need to fix this. Southern European countries would have no option but to join a northern union. Northwestern Europe should lead the way. I know a union of Northwestern Europe is too good to be true, but nothing ever happened by no one ever saying anything at all. Such a union would be attractive to the world, even the envy of it.

F242A921-95BD-46DF-9931-787E72F49EA6
Norwegian fjords.

This is especially important for us concerning Americans, as they would be a attracted to a union of Norway, Britain and Germany, and they would look back to us. What I mean by attraction is that Americans (and Canadians) have a whole continent with every possible type of environment and climate, from tundra to tropical and everything in between. Therefore, Americans are not even remotely interested in little old Norway, Britain or Germany on their own. As Norwegians, Britons and Germans we have to admit a few home truths we do not like to admit:

  1. North America is massive and very impressive indeed!
  2. Norway, Britain and Germany on their own are very small in comparison.
  3. Because America is so vast, Americans are not even remotely interested in, impressed by or attracted to Norway, Britain or Germany on their own.
  4. It is not Americans fault that they are not bothered about us and have no loyalty to their mother countries, they cannot help it, as America is so big and impressive.
  5. It is our fault for being so small and not united.

The EU is too big, too southern (as in Brussels) and too pan-European and hence too unattractive for Americans. Why would Americans move to and set down roots in Poland or Romania? To reiterate, Americans are never attracted to Norway on its own or Britain on its own or Germany on its own, but together we could attract them!

89A48C48-E1DC-4C8E-8619-B07EEFDA2D63
Aurora borealis.

https://northwesterneurope.com

https://northwesterneuropean.com


Intolerance of intolerance of intolerance.

What is the point in being Christian with Islam when that will only lead to the death of Christianity? Clearly being Christian all the time does not work. If anything we Christians should take a leaf out of Islam’s book, that being intolerance for other people and religions. They call intolerance of an intolerant religion Islamophobia. And? Your point is? I am still waiting for your point. I am intolerant of intolerance of intolerance.

Waiting, expecting and believing.

I am waiting for our (as in white people’s) time, for our turn to be up and coming, for our turn to flourish, for our turn to be a superpower, for our turn to be the power and the glory, for our turn to be safe and secure and to increase our numbers. Instead of being in decline and contraction, with the erosion of the homogeneity and purity of our countries through immigration and the recession of our former political power and national glory. All non-white nations, such as Asia and Africa are the ones expecting to be the world’s new superpowers, they are increasing while we decrease, they are developing at a faster rate than we are, in short they are up and coming while we are down and going. The rise of the developing world is being achieved through the expense of white countries. They call it equality and it seems to be a just cause because of WWII. I expect and believe we will get everything we deserve in the next life, but I pray for a miracle down here on earth.

Amen.

Psalm 27:14.

Wait for the Lord;
be strong and take heart
and wait for the Lord.


Central questions of this essay.

  1. Why do humans have to die before they attain eternal bliss?
  2. Why can’t humans attain nirvana like Christ and the Buddha before they die?
  3. What do you care more about your money or Christ and the Buddha?

The death of Christianity.

How can we be spiritual with Christianity? What I mean by spirituality is that sitting cross legged and meditating is not a particularly Christian thing to do in the west. Europeans do not sit cross legged. Therefore, it is really hard to be spiritual with Christianity compared to Buddhism. I have read The Gospel of Buddha and Buddhism For Dummies and I frequently use the Buddhify and Abide apps, and it seems a lot easier to be spiritual with Buddhism and more comfortable than Christianity. It’s as if there is nothing to do in Christianity, we get no instruction. We get the New Testament, the Lord’s Prayer and Communion and that’s about it. With Buddhism there is so much teaching, technicality, instruction and meditation etc. The Buddha had so many teachings and taught everyone how to remove suffering. For example, there is the four noble truths, the eightfold path, the Dhammapada, and the vinaya besides a lot more. In short Buddhism is cool. Being spiritual with Christianity is a bit cringing. Why? If it is possible or even right to be spiritual with Christianity, then I humbly ask YHWH, Jesus Christ and the Buddha to mercifully show me how. Amen.

Through meditating with the Abide app, I have realised that the reason it is easy and cool to be spiritual with Buddhism and it is difficult and a bit cringing to be spiritual with Christianity is because Buddhism teaches you that you can attain Buddhahood, enlightenment and nirvana, where as Christianity never teaches you that you can attain divinity like Christ or ‘Christhood’. It is a fundamental aspect of Buddhism to pursue enlightenment or nirvana, you vow to attain it, where as there is nothing like it in Christianity. This is why Christianity (especially among young people) is dying.

The Theravada tradition considers the final goal of spiritual practice [nirvana], exemplified by the arhat, to be eminently attainable in this lifetime by any sincere practitioner.

Indeed, Vajrayana promises that everyone has the potential to achieve Buddhahood in this lifetime by using the powerful methods it provides.

The teachings about the tathagatagarbha (Sanskrit for “Buddha embryo” or “Buddha nature”) found in some Mahayana texts have influenced the schools of Zen Buddhism. According to these teachings, all beings have the potential to become Buddhas.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 204-205).

So why does Buddhism allow us to pursue enlightenment or nirvana and Christianity not? Because the Buddha lived a full and lengthy life reaching the age of 80 before he died naturally, that is 45 years of teaching and preaching after he attained nirvana at the age of 35. While Jesus Christ was brutally killed unnaturally by being nailed to the cross at the age 30 or 33.

So how do you attain brotherly Buddhahood or ‘Christhood’? To me a fundamental aspect of it is that you have to give everything away. The rest of this essay will expand on this and try to show us some insight into how that may be possible.

Imitate Christ and the Buddha.

Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ.

1 Corinthians 11:1.

Whoever says he abides in him ought to walk in the same way in which he walked.

1 John 2:6.

To point or think in the opposite or inverse direction of capitalism or instincts, (because the poorer you are the more native you are), is to imitate Christ and the Buddha.


Shakyamuni Buddha.

Buddhist systems are based upon the teachings given 2,500 years ago by one of the great spiritual figures of human history, Shakyamuni Buddha, who lived in the fifth century BCE. According to legendary accounts of his life, he was born into the ruling family of the Shakya clan in today’s Nepal and was expected to someday succeed his father as king. Instead, Prince Siddhartha (as he was known at the time) quit the royal life at the age of 29 after he saw the reality of the extensive suffering and dissatisfaction in the world. He then set out to find a way to overcome this suffering.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 12).

By quitting the royal life at the age of 29 after seeing the reality of the extensive suffering and dissatisfaction in the world, (instead of succeeding his father as king), Shakyamuni Buddha looked back instead of forward. This exemplifies the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism.

After many hardships, at age 35, Prince Siddhartha achieved his goal. Seated under what became known as the Bodhi tree—the tree of enlightenment—he achieved the awakening of Buddhahood. Today a stone platform known as the diamond seat (vajrasana) near the Bodhi tree in Bodh Gaya marks the spot. From then on, he was known as Shakyamuni Buddha, the awakened (Buddha) sage (muni) of the Shakya clan.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 12).

The Great Renunciation.

The young Siddhartha Gautama grew up surrounded by luxury and wealth. He was protected from the harsh realities of life by his father who had been warned that his son would withdraw from the world should he encounter such sights. However, one day when riding outside the palace grounds, the future Buddha saw four things that deeply disturbed him; an old man, a sick man, a dead man and finally a wandering holy man who had given up his home and family to search for knowledge. The prince became determined to find the reason for human suffering and the final cure for it. He decided to leave his luxurious life, wives and palace to seek spiritual salvation. One night he left his palace accompanied by his attendant and richly bridled horse. When far from the city he took off his princely jewellery and clothes and cut off his hair and beard with his sword. He changed his royal robes for the simple robes worn by holy men and gave his horse to his attendant.

http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/b/buddhism-and-the-life-of-the-buddha/

The Great Renunciation is how Siddhartha Gautama looked back instead of forward and it perfectly matches the concept of inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism. Siddhartha Gautama turned from the life of a wealthy prince in a luxurious palace, hidden from the miseries of the world, to the life of an ascetic holy man. This is why or how Siddhartha Gautama attained nirvana and became the Buddha.

The meaning of renunciation.

Long hair was one of the prominent signs of Indian royalty, and Siddhartha’s decision to cut his hair symbolized his strong determination to change the entire pattern of his life and devote himself to the spiritual quest. Even today, the ceremony marking someone’s formal decision to enter the Buddhist way of life often includes having a lock of hair snipped off, in imitation of the Buddha’s great renunciation. Followers who choose to become ordained as a celibate monk or a nun have their entire head shaved, as a sign that they have completely renounced the life of a layperson. But renunciation isn’t really a matter of having your hair cut or changing your outward appearance in some other way. Nor does it mean that you necessarily have to give away your possessions. The true meaning of renunciation is the decision to give up attachment. The cause of suffering and dissatisfaction is attachment, so you need to give up attachment. If you can possess something without becoming attached to it—without letting it become an obstacle to your spiritual progress or a waste of your time and energy—you don’t need to give it up.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 46).

Despite what this book says “Nor does it mean that you necessarily have to give away your possessions.” I believe you do. I believe if you are as serious as the Buddha, and if you want to change the world, then you do have to give a lot away.

In other words, when you commit yourself to Buddhism as a path, you don’t renounce your family or your career; you renounce the conventional view that you can find true happiness in worldly concerns. You renounce the relentless message of the consumer society that the next car or house or vacation or accomplishment will finally relieve your dissatisfaction and bring you the contentment you so desperately seek.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 130).

The six-year fast.

Wandering in the forest with five other holy men Siddhartha followed a very strict regime of fasting and deprivation until he almost starved to death.

http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/b/buddhism-and-the-life-of-the-buddha/

243D7B16-834D-47A7-8C39-E8B6841B6AC2
Pursuing enlightenment, Buddha first practiced severe asceticism before recommending a non-ascetic middle way.

Thus began what later became known as the six-year fast. Siddhartha sat exposed to the elements day and night. He ate less and less, eventually consuming nothing but the few seeds that happened to blow into his lap. His body, once so glorious and attractive, became withered and shrunken. Eventually, the practice reduced Siddhartha to little more than a living skeleton, but still he persevered.

Finally, one day Siddhartha took stock of himself. He discovered that, in his weakened condition, he couldn’t think as clearly as before; therefore, he was farther from his goal than when he’d started six years ago. Tired and dirty, he decided to refresh himself in the nearby river but nearly drowned before he could pull himself out. As Siddhartha lay on the bank recovering, he realized that if he were ever going to succeed, he’d have to follow the middle way between self-indulgence and extreme self-denial. (Later this phrase, the middle way, took on more meaning and became the expression that the Buddha himself often used when referring to his teachings. Even today, Buddhism is widely known as the middle way that avoids all extremes.)

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 45).

Siddhartha Gautama deserved divinity because of his looking back instead of forward, because of his Great Renunciation and because of his almost dying of starvation.

The enlightenment.

Realising at last that he had failed to acquire spiritual knowledge by such extreme means he resolved to seek it by a moderate ‘Middle Way’. He took food and seated himself under a Bodhi tree or ‘Tree of Wisdom’, vowing not to move until he had gained enlightenment and finally solved the mystery of human suffering.

Siddhartha then entered deep meditation and through the following night had a succession of realisations that culminated in a final understanding of the cause of human suffering and sorrow. He saw his own successive re-births, how all beings passed into the higher and lower worlds and finally how craving, desire and ignorance are the cause of the process of re-birth. With this realisation he became a Buddha which means ‘Awakened One’. He remained for seven days under the Bodhi tree or ‘tree of wisdom’.

http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/b/buddhism-and-the-life-of-the-buddha/

7C5E7A8C-1396-41CD-BA30-AA7429A7764F
Shakyamuni Buddha.

Parable of the Golden Doctor.

Imagine if a doctor was like a Buddhist or Christian monk and cured and saved peoples lives not for a huge salary, but just to keep in the Buddha’s Middle Way. Is there reward in heaven for such a doctor? What this doctor did goes against every animal instinct. This doctor goes against nature. This doctor is golden.

Example.

Like the doctor analogy, I am trying to point or think in the opposite or inverse direction of capitalism or instincts. I am semi-deliberately maintaining hundredaire status. What I do is read literature, mix music, practice relativity, hike and practice botany, in order to balance the arts with the sciences or the unfundamental with the fundamental.

Secular capitalism.

Liberal democracies and especially western capitalist governments will never teach you the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism, because they are secular and capitalist. But religion does. Western governments are all about wealth and making you rich, they are driven by economic growth and profits and they literally educate you from birth to go for the maximum wage and to save up as much money as possible. However, the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism points or thinks in the opposite or inverse direction of capitalism or instincts.

3. Renunciation is not simply for the ordained. For the lay, it entails the ability to quickly locate and effectively deal with the defilements circulated by capitalism, consumerism, and the mainstream mass media. 

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 20).


Definitions.

noun (Nativism)

  1. the policy of protecting the interests of native inhabitants against those of immigrants.
  2. the policy or practice of preserving or reviving an indigenous culture.

noun (Primitivism)

  1. a recurrent theory or belief, as in philosophy or art, that the qualities of primitive or chronologically early cultures are superior to those of contemporary civilization.
  2. the state of being primitive: the primitivism of the Stone Age peoples.
  3. the qualities or style characterizing primitive art.

Origins.

The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism was conceived because it has become obvious in recent times how much the New World (United States of America) has overtaken the Old World such as Egypt, Israel, Greece, Italy, Spain and Britain etc. We non-American natives are starting to look ‘primitive.’ Therefore, because America is a modern advanced civilisation then we look back to ancient and primitive civilisations such as the Nile Valley and Levant. That is we point or think in the opposite or inverse direction of capitalism or instincts (inverse of deserved divinity), which means instead of looking to those whose names we know or who are famous such as the rich, advanced, modern and future, we look back to those whose names we do not know on earth but only in heaven, such as the poor, primitive, prehistoric and past.

Advanced primitivism.

How can Americans be natives or primitives? They are not native Americans and they are the most advanced people on Earth. What about if they could be advanced primitives? That is like two sides of a coin, advanced scientifically but primitive spiritually? What if we all could be advanced primitives? We could get to the stars but we are still primitive.

Parable of the Golden Scientist.

Imagine if a scientist who made smart phones was like a Buddhist or Christian monk and made smart phones not for personal profit, but just to keep the company innovative and state of the art. What this scientist did goes against every animal instinct. This scientist goes against nature. This scientist would be golden.

Smart.

Do not be spiritually advanced as it is vain. Be spiritually primitive. With smart technology such as the internet, iPhones and iPads etc this is important for the 21st century. Why? Because you avoid trouble.

Two ways.

There are possibly two ways in which you can be advanced or primitive. First of all the older you are the more advanced you are compared to a child, hence obviously the younger you are the more primitive you are. Conversely, the older you are the more primitive you are as in our technophobe grandparents and our historical ancestors, hence the younger or more modern you are the more advanced or smart you are, as in the current tech-savvy youth, the state-of-the-art and the cutting-edge.

Stone Age weapon.
Stone Age weapon.

Life and survival.

Europeans are native to the cold.
The poorer you are the more native you are.

If life and survival are a struggle for you, then know that you are more native than those whose life and survival is not a struggle. You will be rewarded in heaven. In fact the further you go back in time the harder life and survival was, as in Palaeolithic and Mesolithic man, who were purely native to their environments.

Mesolithic man.
Mesolithic man.

Native poverty.

This theory started as ‘white nativism’ which to begin with was very white and heavily engrossed in Celtic, Anglo-Saxon and Viking art, symbolism and culture. (Check my very first posts for proof). White nativism eventually developed into the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism. Politically accurate people are very altruistic and noble, they passionately believe in our own people and they deliberately pursue poverty and lower status to that end. This essay and the theory of the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism is founded on the principle of ‘native poverty’ or the relationship between nativeness and poverty:

The poorer you are the more native you are.

I also like following statement.

Europeans are native to the cold.
(And that is the way we want to keep it.)

To be native of a climate is better than being native of geographic region.

The above statements are entirely noble and altruistic and were thought of out of total and genuine care and concern for my own people, the poor native Europeans.

To spread.

Because of the Holocaust white people do not want to procreate anymore. What I mean by procreation is the spread, expansion and growth of the species, this was the entire point of empires and colonisation, to spread. This is why we colonised Australia, South Africa and the New World, to spread. It is only natural for a species to want to spread, it is in our genes, for example tigers want lots of tigers not lions or ligers. In fact everything spreads, viruses spread, plants spread and animals spread, everything spreads except white people. Not only do white people not want to spread anymore, like South Africa, they are actively going about undoing or reversing their former spread. They are doing this by the reverse spread or reverse colonisation of non-native people (mostly from their former colonies) into their own native territory.

Because of two world wars not only do Europeans not want to conquer anymore, they do not defend themselves either.

Tenderness.

I am studying Buddhism at the moment and I absolutely love it! However, the following quote of the Dalai Lama confused me: “My religion is very simple. My religion is kindness.” To me this seems too simple. If life was always a kindergarten that would be fine, but we grow up and find out the world is more complicated than that. We worry about our countries and females. For example, I am loyal and patriotic. I struggle being tender toward everyone when it comes to our country, people and religions (Judaism, Christianity and Buddhism). How can we be 100% tender toward others 100% of the time when that is a threat to our own country, people and religions? How can we be 100% kind to 100% of people when that is a threat to our own countries, peoples and religions? It is as if we are not supposed to think about things like that. They call the slightest unkindness hate. But surely a little rough and tumble has to be used somewhere to defend ourselves?

Be kind and compassionate to one another, forgiving each other, just as in Christ God forgave you.

Ephesians 4:32.

Frustration.

What makes me frustrated is the constant battle, contradiction or hypocrisy going on inside me between kindness, tenderness, love and compassion for all beings and the defence of one’s own countries, peoples and religions (Judaism, Christianity and Buddhism). Are we supposed to be kind and compassionate to the point of losing our countries to immigrants, the decline of our religions and of not protecting our females? I feel that such kindness, tenderness, love and compassion will only lead to shame, dishonour, embarrassment and disgrace. They call the slightest unkindness hate. How will I respond to this frustration? I will ask YHWH, Jesus Christ and the Buddha to help me understand and resolve this inner conflict.

Read the whole essay before you judge me, and see if I am not noble and altruistic.


Frequently asked questions.

How do you practice the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism?

It is a form of financial asceticism. I have no desire for a lot of money and I give a lot of what little I have away. Giving money away is the only real action that a spiritual seeker can take that actually does something, as opposed to praying, meditating or self mortification. Giving money away is also a non-lethal leap of faith that anyone can take.

Generosity (Sanskrit and Pali: dana) is one of the perfections of the practitioner in Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism. It is said that Shakyamuni practiced generosity and the other perfections for many lifetimes before attaining enlightenment. The Jataka tales of his past lives illustrate this virtue through stories in which he gives away everything, including his own body, to help others. The famous Vessantara Jataka tells the story of the last life of Shakyamuni before he became the Buddha. He was born as Prince Vessantara who attained perfection in generosity by giving away all his possessions and even his wife and two children.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 133).

How does the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism work?

It is about looking back instead of forward. The poorer you are the more native you are. That is it looks back to those whose names we cannot know on earth, such as the poor, primitive, prehistoric and past, instead of those whose names we do know and who are famous, including the rich, advanced, modern and future. This concerns individual people as well as countries. Instead of looking at the new world superpower we look back to the old power and glory of history.

What field exactly is the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism? 

It is my faith and my belief. It is religion, scripture and parables.

When you take monastic ordination, you leave behind the comfort and familiarity of family and friends and enter an entirely new world where the old rules no longer apply. You give external expression to your inner renunciation by cutting off your hair (a mark of personal beauty and pride), giving up your favorite clothes, and letting go of your prized possessions.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 135).


Food.

What is the difference between humans and animals?

Food.

Animals such as birds are funny because they never think about sharing food, they just go for the belly or the energy of life, that is the fats, protein and nutrients etc, without even considering another bird or animal.

The benefits of sociality are not limited to mutual protection and cooperative behaviours such as food-sharing have been documented for some of the higher primates, including chimpanzees, bonobos and capuchin monkeys.

Food-sharing also plays an important role. Male chimpanzees exchange meat for support against adversaries and have also been known to raid domestic crops for items that may be traded against favours.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 24-25).

Higher primates share food in exchange for favours, however, it is very rare indeed for animals to intentionally and consciously share food with one another. When animals see other hungry or starving animals they usually think to themselves ‘hard luck mate, you’re on your own!’

It is exceedingly rare for a squirrel to intentionally and consciously given a nut to another squirrel.

No animal in creation has ever intentionally and consciously cared for or healed another sick or injured animal. When animals see another sick or injured animal they think to themselves ‘hard luck mate, you’re on your own!’

Money.

What is the one thing that no human being in creation has done that Jesus Christ and the Buddha did? What is the one difference between say the Queen or superstar DJs and Jesus Christ or the Buddha?

Money.

Humans are funny like animals because they never think about sharing money, they just go for the wallet or the bank account, that is the cash, lolly and doe etc, without even considering another human. Humans are funny because:

Food is to animals as gold is to humans.

Apart from Jesus Christ and the Buddha and perhaps Saint Francis of Assisi and his followers, no human has ever intentionally and consciously given all of their money away, or deliberately pursued poverty.

Francis of Assisi.
In Christianity, Francis of Assisi and his followers practiced extreme acts of asceticism. His sanctity was based first and foremost on his deliberate pursuit of poverty.

When it comes to money humans think very similar to animals. When humans see another poor human being in need of money, for example a begging homeless person, they usually think to themselves ‘hard luck mate, you’re on your own!’

And therefore what does YHWH say to us all?

”Hard luck mate, you’re on your own!”


Tonsure.

I am not saying we should be like a homeless person, as there is nothing formal, official or deliberate about being poor or homeless in the capitalist west. We usually see such homeless people as being ‘scum, scaff and chav.’ However, do you look at Buddhist or Christian monks as ‘scum, scaff and chav?’ Indeed, do you look at Christ or the Buddha as ‘scum, scaff and chav?’ Thanks to lay Buddhists, Buddhist monks are not homeless, but they are just as poor, therefore, the only difference is that monks are officially, formally or deliberately poor. They also usually wear certain attire and have certain haircuts to display their poverty and renunciation. Therefore, I am not saying we should be poor like a homeless person, but that we should be deliberately, consciously or formally poorer, more like a Buddhist or Christian monk. In reality, I am saying that we should all take a little less and give a little more. For example if you earn £20,000 a month, would you not be ‘okay’ with £5,000 a month? I am fine on about £850 a month.

917E2FEA-DD9B-4308-B599-71CB4AD7C3AD
Tonsure is the practice of cutting or shaving some or all of the hair on the scalp, as a sign of religious devotion or humility. Current usage more generally refers to cutting or shaving for monks, devotees, or mystics of any religion as a symbol of their renunciation of worldly fashion and esteem. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonsure).

Economics of Buddhism.

Why do Buddhist monks reject the idea of money?

Practicing Buddhists make five promises – not to lie, not to steal, not to engage in sexual misconduct, not to harm any living creature and not to take intoxicating substances which lead to carelessness. These are called the ‘5 precepts’.

When Buddhist monks and nuns ordain – don the robes, shave their heads, and start their training – they make all of the same promises that lay Buddhists (practicing Buddhists who aren’t monks) do, but also promise to let go of their attachments to all social conventions. It’s what the Buddha did on his path to enlightenment, so the Vinaya – the rules he put together for monks to follow – say they should do the same.

To Buddhists (and a lot of economists), money counts as a social convention. Coins are only valuable because we’ve decided that they are, and the same goes for paper banknotes. So like other social conventions, Buddhist monks give it up. They can’t buy or sell anything, get cash out of the bank or even give or accept charitable donations.

Without money, how do monks get by?

Buddhist monks and nuns are completely reliant on the lay community to provide them with the material things they need to survive. In warmer Buddhist countries, monks will walk around their local village at mealtimes in what’s called an ‘alms round’, holding a bowl for locals to put food into. In the West, food often gets donated to monasteries in bulk, and volunteers then use it to prepare meals for the monks.

The lay community provides the money and the labor to build shelter for monks, make them clothes and buy them the technology they need to keep up with the world outside the monastery, from computers to iPads. Some monastic communities like the Forest Sangha even have a Twitter account.

Once a year, during the autumn festival of Kathina, families offer monks and nuns all the cloth they need for robes to get them through the winter months. Lay Buddhists club together to provide them with the basics in what’s known as an annual celebration of giving.

What do lay Buddhists get in return?

The lay community provides the monastic community with material support in exchange for the spiritual support they receive from them, in the form of ceremonies, guided meditation, or ad-hoc advice. It’s not a tit-for-tat kind of exchange – you don’t get a passage from the scriptures every time you donate a tin of tomatoes – but more of a relationship of mutual interdependence, or ‘gift economics’.

https://www.ecnmy.org/engage/this-is-how-buddhist-monks-live-without-money/


Jesus Christ or Albert Einstein?

Who do you believe in Albert Einstein or Jesus Christ? What is unfundamental in the universe? Human created things like the arts? God created things like the soul? The sciences are fundamental, but Jesus Christ and the Buddha were not advanced scientists, they were deities who talked in simple parables that even the lowliest could comprehend. It takes years of research and studying to understand Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity, (in short relativity is too advanced or complex), where as everyone can understand Jesus Christ’s and the Buddha’s teachings without any training. Therefore, although the sciences may get us to the stars, our hopes, dreams and aspirations for the human soul are with faith and the arts. Human beings are unfundamental, we are funny, comical and loving and perceive things like art, language, writing and pareidolia, we are not boring and mathematical robots. Because the Christ and the Buddha were ancient men what does that tell us? It tells us that you do not need to be modern or advanced to have a higher state of consciousness, you can be primitive. No matter how high and advanced we get ultimately we are all beaten by two ancient and primitive parable talking men. How? It must be relative.

Gautama Buddha.
Before Siddhārtha Gautama became Buddha he was the son of a king and lived a life of opulence in a palace, hidden from the miseries of the world. He then renounced his wealth and deliberately pursued poverty and practiced extreme self-mortification, almost dying of starvation in the process. Because of this Herculean sacrifice from a rich life to one of abject poverty and suffering (or inverse of deserved divinity), Siddhārtha Gautama then consequently attained nirvana and became the Buddha.

Involuntary belief.

Why did human beings or hominins invent and pursue the divine and God (or gods) before anything else such as science? Science is a relatively modern invention, but the gods have been around since prehistory.

Religion is universal in human society, and it appears to be a fundamental part of the human condition. Why should people all over the world believe in a supernatural being or beings inhabiting a realm detached from our day-to-day existence? Though religions differ considerably throughout the world, a belief in such beings is a very common aspect of them.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 147).

Human beings are like magnets to the divine, we just do it involuntarily and unconsciously without thinking about it. If you just pause for a second, you can ask why do we do it? Why do humans make isms? Why of all things did we have to become Muslim or Jewish? This is what scientists do. Humans have no proof of God yet we just involuntarily believe. Humans need to know, hope or believe that there is an afterlife or an end and point to all our suffering.


Animals are funny.

Pareidolia is where a living being perceives the shape or form of another living being in completely natural or unintentional man-made objects.

For example humans can perceive shapes of animals in clouds or anthropoid faces in unintentional man-made objects. Art is similar to pareidolia, only the object is unnatural or man-made and the perceived image is intentional. This is the difference between humans and animals, as in animals cannot perceive pareidolia, recognise art or understand writing (symbols). For example animals cannot perceive cave paintings, or recognise the object or image of the lines and shapes of pigment, they just see a wall.

Not a single animal in creation has ever appreciated art, only humans.

That is the difference between humans and animals, as in only humans appreciate art. If a living creature can perceive and appreciate art, it is by definition non-animal.

The main difference is that humans use symbols and chimpanzees do not. There is little doubt that archaic humans were capable of symbolic thought, though the extent is disputed, and the ability may not even be entirely absent from chimpanzees. However, its expression in modern humans is not found elsewhere and it sets us apart from the rest of the animal kingdom past and present.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 418).

Altamira bisons.
Altamira bisons, Cave of Altamira, Spain, Upper Paleolithic, around 36,000 years ago.

Unless it is moving or stinking animals cannot perceive another animal. To an animal the ability to read, recognise art and perceive pareidolia is telepathy. When Palaeolithic man and woman started to (not coincidentally) paint ‘animals’ in caves he or she must have perceived pareidolia, therefore by creating such timeless masterpieces, Palaeolithic man and woman proved beyond a doubt that he or she was far beyond animal.

5CF71294-7164-4E2C-88DF-C4D894C20A38
Lascaux cave paintings, the Upper Paleolithic, estimated at around 17,000 years (early Magdalenian).

Among these was the Catholic priest and archaeologist Abbé Henri Breuil, who was able to attest to the great antiquity of the caves [Lascaux] and described them as ‘The Sistine Chapel of Prehistory’. Another early visitor was Pablo Picasso, who on emerging from the cave, is said to have remarked – in reference to modern art – “We have invented nothing”.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 176).

33,000 year old hand stencil by a paleolithic visitor to a cave at Chauvet Pont d’Arc in the south of France.
33,000 year old hand stencil by a paleolithic visitor to a cave at Chauvet Pont d’Arc in the south of France.

Who is prehistoric man?

Note the above image is how humans did a signature before they could write. However, I wonder what his or her name was? We know nothing about prehistoric people other than bones and stones, that is we know nothing about their names, deeds or individual characters, although for example they may have proven their bravery by killing large animals, and they may also have been spiritual and yearned for eternity and the afterlife.

These [three skulls] were dated by argon-argon dating of volcanic material found in the geological stratum containing the remains, and found to be between 154,000 and 160,000 years old. All three of the skulls show cut marks indicative of some form of mortuary ritual: the earliest example of such practice documented for modern humans.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 118).

The problem for prehistoric people is that they obviously did not have writing or recorded history, so we do not know their names, deeds or individual characters, therefore they did not achieve eternity down here on earth or in life. Hence, because we do not and cannot ever know their names down here on earth but only in heaven, therefore hallowed be your name and on earth as in heaven is for them.

9A3DB5A2-CD7D-411B-9D2A-C00D648AE0D2
Tetragrammaton. The Hebrew name of God transliterated in four letters as YHWH or JHVH and articulated as Yahweh or Jehovah. “He who pronounces the Name with its own letters has no part in the world to come!” Such is the prohibition of pronouncing the Name as written that it is sometimes called the “Ineffable”, “Unutterable”, or “Distinctive Name”. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetragrammaton).

The names of prehistoric men are “Ineffable” and “Unutterable” because we do not and can never know them in life or on earth.


Symmetry.

Pareidolia is unfundamental unlike the sciences such as mathematics, relativity and botany, it is needless like the arts including religion, art, philosophy, literature, drama and music. It is very human. The sciences like https://mathsandtime.com are perfect, precise, ordered, symmetrical and fundamental.

00891CB9-2DDD-4964-93BD-451F859BE276
Time.

The arts such as philosophy and parables are imperfect, imprecise, random, asymmetrical and unfundamental.

The Golden Bird.
Parable of the Golden Bird.

William Shakespeare’s plays are about as random, unfundamental and wet as you can get. I admit I questioned the spiritual and divine and the arts when I was studying https://mathsandtime.com, which is simple relativity. However, thespianism and the arts are beautiful and wet while the sciences are unattractive and dry. William Shakespeare is the Einstein of the random, unfundamental and wet.

3847BEA5-B0DE-46AF-B7AD-FD0E3EB9B873
Mr. William Shakespeare’s Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies is a collection of plays by William Shakespeare, published in 1623, commonly referred to by modern scholars as the First Folio. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Folio

It was some simple parables that I called the Golden Parables, which basically all say the same thing and which are applicable to any human such as a director or politician, as well as to any animal such as a bird, dog or lion etc, that turned me back to faith, the arts and the unfundamental. Therefore, I have concluded that our hopes, dreams and aspirations for the soul are with faith and the arts, not with https://mathsandtime.com. 

Spirituality and time.

When I was studying https://mathsandtime.com, I went through a phase of secular and rational thinking in which I lost all faith in things spiritual and divine, including all the arts. I lost all faith in all musicians I formerly liked, I said to myself why listen to them when there is Albert Einstein? I even questioned history as in what is the point of studying say Roman history? Then I said to myself of course Roman history is very important and then I read a book about it. Because I was studying http://magnitudeoftime.com I stated rational things like:

“Time is not spiritual or divine.”

“Do not seek spiritual enlightenment, seek time intellectually.”

”Never listen to electronic beats, all you need is a ticking clock.”

And I really believed it!

Formulas v parables.

When I was studying http://squareoftime.com I said that if you want to say something, say it with mathematics, formulas and equations not with lyrics, parables or philosophy etc. However, the problem with mathematics and physics is that although you can fundamentally command people with formulas and equations much better than you can with philosophy, they are actually utterly devoid of any philosophical or political content. Therefore, we have absolutely no hope or dreams for our salvation or for forgiveness (particularly to do with the Holocaust) with mathematics, physics and the sciences etc. Hence, although the arts such as parables, lyrics and philosophy do not command people in the same way that equations and formulas do, they have moral and political content and can inspire people and can change the world.

Golden Parables.

When I discovered the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism, it made me understand that Jesus Christ and the Buddha were not advanced scientists, they were deities who talked in simple parables, which everyone can understand, whereas to understand the general theory of relativity we need years of training and education. Also concerning money and forgiveness, without the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism I would be the type to say ‘hard luck mate, you’re on your own,’ that is I would think like an animal concerning money and forgiveness. It was some simple parables that I called the Golden Parables, which are applicable to any human such as a director or politician, as well as to any animal such as a bird, dog or lion etc, which initially changed my scientific and secular thinking and turned me back to faith, the arts and the unfundamental.

The golden bird.
Parable of the Golden Bird.

Mixing.

Like Shakespeare’s plays, mixing and the electronic music industry is as random, unfundamental and wet as you can get. Contrary to my former statement, “never listen to electronic beats, all you need is a ticking clock” I would now like to state that mixing music is simply beautiful and hip in a way that science can never be. Thousands of people flock to clubs, events and gigs with superstar DJs every weekend, where as no one flocks to a mathematics or physics classroom.

Now I Can Breathe Again Song by Simon Patterson.

Conclusion.

To conclude, although I love http://magnitudeoftime.com and will always do it as well as other sciences, I have concluded that there is hope for the soul with faith and the arts while there is nothing in https://mathsandtime.com. Hence, I choose faith and the arts over science. However, I will always do both and hope to balance and play the fundamental and the unfundamental off of each other.


Recorded history.

It is the invention of writing that brings us, via semi-mythical figures such as Gilgamesh, to the earliest dawning of recorded history.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 346).

It is about who was recorded history? Who was the power and the glory of the age? Not who is the new super power of the present. You have to look back instead of forward. It is better to say who was recorded history at the time?

Symbolism.

Art, literature and science are all consequences of a behavioural package anthropologists refer to as ‘modern human behaviour.’ These things would not be possible without our ability to use symbols to convey information. Symbols can take the form of sounds, images or objects. They may refer directly to an object or idea, for example a representational image; they may be totally abstract, such as spoken or written words. Thus for example a drawing of a cat, the sound ‘cat’ or the written letters ‘c-a-t’ may all be used to refer to a cat.

Syntactic language is a system of communication that enables an effectively infinite range of meanings to be conveyed, but it is only one component of our ability to use symbols – an ability we do not share with our fellow apes. We use symbols all the time – whenever we read a newspaper, check the time, consult a map or admire a painting or sculpture. All of these activities involve symbolic behaviour: human society could not function without it.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 19).

Phonetics.

Phonetics, alphabets, writing and speech are unfundamental. Are writing and alphabets possibly a descendant of primitive art and symbolism?

Göbekli Tepe is thought to be the world’s oldest temple.

If the Göbekli Tepe symbols were indeed pictograms, then the origins of writing may extend back into the early Neolithic, thousands of years before the appearance of writing systems such as cuneiform and hieroglyphic script.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 248).

As we saw in Chapter 18, semasiographic systems in Southwest Asia might go back to the pre-pottery Neolithic, but were these the forerunners of lexigraphy-based systems? In simple terms, did writing come from pictures?

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 348).

Prehistoric man could not read or write but they could still speak.

There is no evidence in Homo habilis for the range of complex behaviours associated with modern humans, although it has been suggested that the species might have employed some form of language.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 55).

Complete writing (systemic phoneticism).

The world’s first urban societies emerged in Mesopotamia from around 3500 BC, closely followed by the emergence of a unified Egyptian state along the Nile. These developments were in both cases accompanied by the invention of writing systems: cuneiform script in Mesopotamia and hieroglyphic script in Egypt.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 341).

The seeds of Mesopotamian writing or recorded history began in Sumer with ‘accounting tokens’, however, complete writing was not ‘attained’ until the invention of ‘systemic phoneticism’ in Sumer.

During the Early and Middle Uruk periods (4200 to 3500 BC), the tokens became increasingly widespread and some featured incised markings. On the basis of later cuneiform script, these ‘complex’ tokens have been interpreted as representing sheep, oil, metal ingots, honey, garments and other commodities, whereas plain tokens might have been used to represent the quantities involved.

Over 5,000 clay tablets have been found at Uruk, dating to the Late Uruk period. They contain incised or impressed signs, made with a stylus while the clay was still soft, and grouped together in rectangular boxes known as cases. The script is known as proto-cuneiform, and is the precursor of the cuneiform (‘wedge shaped’) writing that remained in use in Mesopotamia for thousands of years. The tablets are records of economic and administrative data rather than lexigraphic text. They record the commodities in question (barley, sheep, fields, etc.), quantities, accounting periods, nature of the transaction, parties involved, and names of officials and institutions. Possibly the ‘complex’ tokens formed the basis for the proto-cuneiform signs for commodities, and the plain tokens the amounts involved.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 348).

“Seeds of Mesopotamian writing.” Mesopotamian Accounting Tokens.

Yet Sumer’s idea of systemic phoneticism already at its inception, evidently spread far beyond the Tigris and Euphrates, both east to the Indus and west to the Nile Valley, where the idea took root among other rising civilisations. Different languages and different social needs now demanded new solutions of there own.

Most scholars still prefer to believe that writing originated independently in many regions of the world as an expression of a society’s having attained an ‘advanced’ level of civilisation. However, writing is not an automatic reward of social sophistication. Writing must be elaborated, and this entails a protracted process determined by evolving social needs. Though there are other possible interpretations, the cumulative weight of evidence urges the consideration that the idea of complete writing may have emerged only once in humankind’s history. Drawing from a standardized repertoire of pictograms and symbols – the distillation of a long development from notches to tablets  – the Sumerians of Mesopotamia elaborated what has since become humankind’s most versatile tool. All other writing systems and scripts are, then perhaps derivatives of this one original idea – systemic phoneticism – that emerged between 6000 and 5700 years ago in Mesopotamia.

(A History of Writing, Steven Roger Fischer, page 32-33).

Alphabets and recorded history.

The history of the alphabet started in ancient Egypt. By 2700 BCE Egyptian writing had a set of some 22 hieroglyphs. However, although seemingly alphabetic in nature, the original Egyptian uniliterals were not a system and were never used by themselves to encode Egyptian speech.

Egyptian hieroglyphs.
Egyptian hieroglyphs.

In the Middle Bronze Age an apparently “alphabetic” system known as the Proto-Sinaitic script is thought by some to have been developed in central Egypt around 1700 BCE for or by Semitic workers, and based on letter appearances and names, it is believed to be based on Egyptian hieroglyphs.

Proto-Sinaitic/proto-Canaanite script.
Proto-Sinaitic/proto-Canaanite script.

This script eventually developed into the Proto-Canaanite alphabet, which in turn was refined into the Phoenician alphabet. Phoenician was the first major phonemic script. In contrast to two other widely used writing systems at the time, Cuneiform and Egyptian hieroglyphs, it contained only about two dozen distinct letters, making it a script simple enough for common traders to learn. Another advantage of Phoenician was that it could be used to write down many different languages, since it recorded words phonemically.

1E412530-409E-4B08-8676-69EB57678010
Phoenician alphabet.

The script was spread by the Phoenicians, whose Thalassocracy allowed the script to be spread across the Mediterranean. In Greece, the script was modified to add the vowels, giving rise to the first true alphabet. The Greeks took letters which did not represent sounds that existed in Greek, and changed them to represent the vowels. This marks the creation of a “true” alphabet, with both vowels and consonants as explicit symbols in a single script. In its early years, there were many variants of the Greek alphabet, a situation which caused many different alphabets to evolve from it.

Greek alphabet.
Greek alphabet.

The Cumae form of the Greek alphabet was carried over by Greek colonists from Euboea to the Italian peninsula, where it gave rise to a variety of alphabets used to inscribe the Italic languages. One of these became the Latin alphabet, which was spread across Europe as the Romans expanded their empire. Even after the fall of the Roman state, the alphabet survived in intellectual and religious works. It eventually became used for the descendant languages of Latin (the Romance languages) and then for the other languages of Europe.

by Jan van der Crabben, published on 28 April 2011.

https://www.ancient.eu/amp/1-73/

Latin alphabet.
Latin alphabet.

The Romans took the Latin alphabet and recorded history to Western Europe, places like Britannia, Gaul and Hispania. Then in turn Western Europe spread the Latin alphabet and recorded history to the remaining pre-literate regions of the earth including the Americas, Africa and Australia. Finally, through computers and digitalisation America reinvented the very meaning of scripts, notepads and tablets etc, making recorded history eternal.

Evolution of the English alphabet.
Evolution of the English alphabet.

The rest is history.

Eternity.

There is no eternity without recorded history, that is that cavemen and prehistoric man (excepting cave art) did not attain eternity because they left no buildings, writing or literature behind. We do not know their names or deeds, so they are not eternal, hence hallowed be your name. However, thanks to themselves and archaeology, it was firstly the Egyptians who invented recorded history and architecture and who put thousands of years of time, energy and devotion into eternity and the afterlife through religion, writing, mummification and tombs etc, that accomplished this.
Recorded history is eternity.

Inextricable link.

A6105B70-D650-4378-A085-77785B82521E
What is the connection between Jesus Christ and the Buddha and recorded history?

There is an inextricable link between Jesus Christ and the Buddha and recorded history. An absolute prerequisite for a nation or civilisation to gloriously attain the Christ or the Buddha is that it must have or be recorded history. You have got to have it! You cannot attain Christ or the Buddha without first attaining writing or recorded history. Why? Because recorded history is eternal. The Christ and the Buddha come at the earliest possible moment in ‘history.’ Both Christ and the Buddha would never come unless recorded history was firmly in place in that country or civilisation, as they would never be famous and their teaching would never be remembered. I know that writing only reached India after the time of the Buddha, but it was close.

Writing wasn’t in use at the Buddha’s time. Because the earliest Buddhist texts were orally transmitted and written down only many centuries after the Buddha’s death, scholars aren’t certain about what the Buddha himself taught and what was later ascribed to him.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 11).

The Buddhist spiritual community (Sangha) took great pains to preserve and transmit his teachings as purely as possible so that they could pass from one generation to the next. These extensive teachings were eventually written down, producing a vast collection (or canon) of the Buddha’s discourses (Pali: suttas; Sanskrit: sutras).

Thanks to the efforts of teachers and their disciples, the Buddha’s teachings (known as Dharma) have been handed down from generation to generation up to the present day.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 13).

During the Buddha’s lifetime, his followers collected and codified these guidelines, which eventually became the code of discipline (vinaya) that has continued to shape the monastic life for more than 2,500 years.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 16).

That is why Jesus Christ came an Israelite, because they invented recorded history, writing and the Bible. It is no coincidence that Jesus Christ, the Son of YHWH came an Israelite. Israel is the site of the oldest continuously inhabited city in the world, that being Jericho.

The city of Jericho is thought to be the oldest continuously inhabited city in the world. Like Homer’s Troy, Jericho inevitably attracted the interest of nineteenth century archaeologists, in search of evidence for walls supposedly destroyed by Joshua’s invading Israelite army.

Dating the beginning of the Neolithic occupation is problematic, but the oldest radiocarbon date, for Sample P-378, suggests that the site [Jericho] was in use by 9250 BC (7825 radiocarbon year BC).

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 244).

Why did Jesus Christ or the Buddha not come at a different time, say in the Palaeolithic period? It is not evolutionary, it is because it would have been useless as they would never have been famous or remembered.


Sub-Saharan Africa.

Why has there been no Jesus Christ or Buddha in sub-Saharan Africa? It is nothing to do with race or phenotype, it is because there has never been recorded history in sub-Saharan Africa.

“The African, however, laments his ignorance of the art of writing, with more ostentation than sincerity; for he boasts at the same time that his gods like to be served with vigor and activity in the field, rather than by prayer and actions such as we term moral…”

(Journal of a residence in Ashantee, comprising notes and researches relative to the Gold Coast, and the interior of Western Africa, chiefly collected from Arabic mss. By Joseph Dupuis, c. 1820, page 247).

200 years ago sub-Saharan Africa had no writing or recorded history, in fact illiteracy is still a problem there today. If sub-Saharan Africa wanted to attain Jesus Christ or the Buddha they would have to be 100% independent.

We can give you almost the time of day when recorded history began on the various coasts of sub-Saharan Africa. For example the following relates of the circumstances of how the Gold Coast (Ghana) was first discovered, the extract is taken from my review of a reading of The Voyages of Cadamosto and Other Documents on Western Africa in the Second Half of the Fifteenth Century, edited by Gerald Roe Crone.

The ‘Gold Coast’ was discovered in January 1471 by Pêro de Escobar and João de Santarém. It was due to a contract that the King of Portugal made with Fernão Gomes in 1469, by which Gomes got the monopoly of trade in West Africa for 5 years, on condition that he explored 100 leagues of new coastline beyond Sierra Leone each year. Subsequently the ‘Gold Coast’ and those other discoveries mentioned above were made. There is also an important account of how St George da Mina (Elmina) was built in 1482, with a fleet of 10 caravels carrying hewed stone and 600 men. The document relates of how Azambuja, the Captain-Major of the fleet, met with Casamansa, the king of the country around the proposed site of the fort, and of the negotiations between them. Hence this is how recorded history began for the Gold Coast (Ghana).

The next forward step in the Portuguese advance was initiated when the King in 1469 leased the monopoly of trade on the West African coast to Fernão Gomes for five years, on condition that he secured the exploration of one hundred leagues of new coastline beyond Sierra Leone each year…

The immediate result of this contract was the voyage of João de Santarém and Pêro de Escobar in 1471 along the Gold Coast to the point near which the fortress of El Mina was afterwards built…

(The Voyages of Cadamosto and Other Documents on Western Africa in the Second Half of the Fifteenth Century, page xxvii).

1488.

Further South Bartolomeu Dias discovered and rounded the Cape of Good Hope in what is now South Africa in May 1488.

Most important among these independent witnesses is a marginal note on folio 13 of a copy of Pierre d’Ailly’s “Imago mundi”, which was the property of Christopher Columbus. This reads as follows:

“Note, that in December of this year, 1488, there landed at Lisbon Bartolomeu Didacus [Dias], the commander of three caravels, who the King of Portugal had sent to Guinea to seek out the land, and who reported that he had sailed 600 leagues beyond the furthest reached hitherto, that is, 450 leagues to the south and then 150 leagues to the north, as far as a cape named by him the Cape of Good Hope, which cape we judge to be in Agisimba, its latitude, as determined by the astrolabe, being 45° S., and its distance from Lisbon 3100 leagues. This voyage he [Dias] had depicted and described from league to league upon a chart, so that he might show it to the king; at all of which I was present (in quibus omnibus interfui).”

This date (namely 1488) is further confirmed by Duarte Pacheco Pereira, the “Achilles Lusitano” of Camoens, for in his “Esmeraldo de Situ Orbis”, written soon after 1505, but only published in 1892, we are told that the Cape was discovered in 1488. Pacheco is a very competent witness, for Dias, on his homeward voyage, met him at the Ilha do Principe.

(Bartolomeu Dias, Ernst Georg Ravenstein, William Brooks Greenlee, Pero Vaz de Caminha, page 20-21).

FFC6B8A9-7138-40E7-9403-8E1572749D73
Bartolomeu Dias discovered the Cape of Good Hope in May 1488.

These ‘histories’ demonstrates why sub-Saharan Africa has not yet attained Jesus Christ or the Buddha.


The message of the Lord’s Prayer.

Nativism and primitivism are the inverse of deserved divinity because the poorer you are the more native you are, that is that the poor deserve divinity and not the rich, for example from super-rich Egyptian god-kings to poor baby Jesus in a manger. To reiterate the theory works economically or socially in the inverse or counter direction to conventional social standards or norms. That is that it does not seek profit and that it looks back to those whose names we cannot know on earth, such as the poor, primitive, prehistoric and past, instead of those whose names we do know and who are famous, including the rich, advanced, modern and future. Hence, because it works backwards or inversely to capitalism or instincts, it explains the message of the Lord’s Prayer.

I am a Christian, however, the whole concept of poverty being a noble virtue or the tale of the wiseman and the rich man is probably an ancient Jewish wisdom. As will be seen the ancient Egyptians and Romans had no such morality. The ancient Egyptians worshipped super-rich god-kings while the entire Roman system of government and political eligibility was based on financial tests or wealth assessments.

Who is prehistoric man?

Ans: YHWH.

In heaven the older you are the more famous and illustrious you are, (as in prehistoric, ancient or classical people).

8EFA481D-1B1B-44F7-BAF7-359B24D367AD
Lascaux cave paintings, the Upper Paleolithic, estimated at around 17,000 years (early Magdalenian).

For example, how famous do you think the painter or painters of the Lascaux or Altamira cave paintings is/are in the afterlife? In the afterlife how famous do you think the Israelite patriarchs of the bible are such as Abraham, Issac, Moses, Aaron and Joshua etc? Imagine meeting them. There is no one more Holy and famous in the world.

Therefore, also imagine being a real soldier who fought in the Greco-Persian Wars or the Trojan War (if it were real). Or imagine being an authentic and indigenous Roman citizen. That must be pretty awesome. We know nothing about prehistoric people other than bones and stones, that is we do not know their names, deeds or individual characters, although for example they may have proven their bravery by killing large animals, and they may also have been spiritual and yearned for eternity and the afterlife. The problem is that prehistoric people obviously did not have writing or recorded history, so we do not know their names or deeds, therefore they did not achieve eternity down here on earth or in life. Hence, because we do not and cannot ever know their names down here on earth but only in heaven, therefore hallowed be your name and on earth as in heaven is for them.

9A3DB5A2-CD7D-411B-9D2A-C00D648AE0D2
Tetragrammaton. The Hebrew name of God transliterated in four letters as YHWH or JHVH and articulated as Yahweh or Jehovah. “He who pronounces the Name with its own letters has no part in the world to come!” Such is the prohibition of pronouncing the Name as written that it is sometimes called the “Ineffable”, “Unutterable”, or “Distinctive Name”. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetragrammaton).

The names of prehistoric men are “Ineffable” and “Unutterable” because we do not and can never know them in life or on earth.

Thus the hypostases Father, Son and Spirit should not be identified with God himself, because, as Gregory Nyssa explained ‘the divine nature (ousia) is unnamable and unspeakable’; ‘Father’, ‘Son’ and ‘Spirit’ are only ‘terms that we use’ to speak of the energeiai by which he has made himself known. Yet these terms have symbolic value because they translate the ineffable reality into images that we understand.

(A History of God, Karen Armstrong, pages 140-141).

And although ancient and classical people did have writing and recorded history they had no cameras or photography, therefore, because we know so little about prehistoric, ancient and classical people on earth, therefore in the afterlife they will be the most famous and illustrious. In the afterlife imagine being a prehistoric man such as Palaeolithic man. It has got to be pretty awesome. Like animals prehistoric man is funny because as he was so primitive and had no wealth or infrastructure, he literally got away with murder and cannibalism etc. I would have so many questions for prehistoric man. Who are you? What is your name? What was it like? Do you have any stories?

Ancient and medieval people had to prove their bravery on the battlefield, but prehistoric men and women such as Palaeolithic and Mesolithic men and women were brave simply by being alive such a long time ago. They had no infrastructure, military or emergency services to rescue them, so if they were attacked by large animals such as lions, wolves, bears and mammoths etc it was a case of ‘hard luck mate, you’re on your own.’

The most dramatic evidence for Neanderthal hunting comes from the 130,000-year-old site of Lehringen in Germany, where a wooden spear with a fire-hardened tip was found lodged between the ribs of a mammoth. Neanderthals clearly weren’t afraid to take on the largest of mammals.

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 100).

They also had no medicine, hence if they got an infection or broke a bone, their lives were in danger. This is not to detract from medieval or ancient people who also had no option but to fight for their tribe, family and lives, for example against Viking marauders. They too had little medicine. In fact the further you go back the harsher and more violent it was.

The older you are the more holy you are and the older you are the more respect you command. Therefore, because we do not know their names, the answer to the question who is prehistoric man? Is YHWH.

Palaeolithic man.
Palaeolithic man.

The power and the glory.

Is the power and the glory that Jesus Christ ascribed to YHWH, some mysterious magic mumbo-jumbo or miraculous hocus-pocus that helped Jesus Christ perform miracles or is it more literal and down to earth than that? Is the power and the glory not just political power and national glory?

The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism works economically or socially in the inverse or counter direction to conventional social standards or norms. This means that it looks back to or points back in the direction of the poor, primitive, prehistoric and past instead of the rich, advanced, modern and future. Instead of looking to or pointing in the direction of those whose names we know down here in life and who are famous, such as superstars, the Queen, Bill Gates and Apple Inc, it looks back to or points back in the direction of those whose names we do not know in life but can only know in heaven, such as the lower class, destitute, ancient and prehistoric.

Lascaux cave paintings.
Lascaux cave paintings. Depiction of aurochs, horses and deer, 17,000 BP.

To attain the power and the glory you have to look back instead of forward.

It is not just in an individual sense but also in a national sense. For example, instead of always looking to the new world super power, we look back to the kingdom of YHWH or the old power and glory of the Old Testament, such as the Nile Valley, North Africa and the Near East then the New Testament such as Greece, Rome, Britain then America etc.

This all works backwards or inversely because the poorer you are the more native you are.

Joseph interpreting Pharaoh’s dream.
Joseph interpreting Pharaoh’s dream.

It is the oldest story in the book. It is about who it was at the time, who was the power and the glory of the age, not who is the new super power in the present. You have to look back instead of forward. It is about being right not bigger or more powerful. Nativism and primitivism are the tale of ‘the wise man and the rich man.’

It is, however, well known, that the Gold-Coast, as well as other parts of the coast of Guinea, has been the source of much wealth; that it has given employment to many classes of our countrymen; and that it has contributed to support the great bulwark and glory of the Nation!

(An Account of the Gold Coast of Africa: with a Brief History of the African Company, Henry Meredith, page v.)


The kingdom of YHWH.

Because of our Abrahamic and biblical history, Judaism, Islam and Christianity, the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism determines that the kingdom of YHWH is the Biblical and Holy Lands, that is the Nile Valley, North Africa and the Near East. The Biblical and Holy Lands are the old power and glory of the Old Testament and they gave us agriculture, architecture, bronze, iron, writing, recorded history, the Bible and God etc, therefore the Nile Valley, North Africa and the Near East connect us to the prehistoric.

In particular, it was generally assumed that major advances in European prehistory resulted from the diffusion of ideas from the classical civilisations of the Levant, the Mediterranean, and Egypt. This view was known as Ex Oriente Lux (‘Light from the East’).

(Humans: from the beginning, by Christopher Seddon, page 228).

How long is a piece of string? Egypt is as old as time, Egyptian history is as old as human evolution itself, this is because hominins evolved in Eastern Africa.

Because of its geographical position, Egypt certainly served as an important conduit for early humans migrating from East Africa towards the rest of the Old World. We know that early Homo erectus left Africa and arrived in Israel as early as 1.8 million years ago.

(The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford Illustrated History), Ian Shaw, page 16).

In fact every person on earth is descended from one man and and one woman who lived in Eastern Africa 275,000 and 150,000 years ago respectively. Egyptian prehistory goes back some 700,000 years.

Egyptian prehistory.
Egyptian prehistory.

Therefore, unlike Britain which received the Latin alphabet and recorded history through being conquered and subjugated by the Romans, the Egyptians started from scratch or from the ground up, that is they started from prehistory and the stone age, (the Palaeolithic and Neolithic) into the Predynastic (Maadi and Naqada cultures), and then into the Early Dynastic and Old Kingdom periods.

According to Petrie, it was during the Naqada III phase that an Asiatic ‘New Race’ arrived in Egypt, bringing with it the seeds of pharaonic civilisation.

(The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford Illustrated History), Ian Shaw, page 43).

The first Naqada phase (Amratian) lies between 4000 and 3500 BC, followed by the second phase (Gerzean), from 3500 to 3200 BC, and the final Predynastic phase runs from 3200 to 3000 BC.

(The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford Illustrated History), Ian Shaw, page 44).

The ancient Egyptians literally got recorded history off the ground from the Stone Age, that is by working with stone and making stone and flint tools and vessels etc.

In contrast to the Upper Palaeolithic Period, many Late Palaeolithic sites have been found in Upper Egypt, dating between 21,000 and 12,000 BP.

(The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford Illustrated History), Ian Shaw, page 23).

During the Naqada II phase, there was considerable development in techniques of stoneworking: various limestones, alabasters, marbles, serpentine, basalt, breccia, gneiss, diorite, and gabbro were being discovered and exploited all along the Nile Valley as well as in the desert, particularly at Wadi Hammamat. The increasing skill in the carving of stone vessels prepared the way for the great achievements of pharaonic stone architecture. The ripple-flaked knives of this period are among the most accomplished examples of the working of flint anywhere in the world.

(The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford Illustrated History), Ian Shaw, page 51).

The Egyptians invented writing and built the first large entirely stone building in the world, that being Djoser’s Step Pyramid.

Tradition had it that Imhotep (Greek form: Imouthes) was the architect of Djoser’s pyramid and inventor of building in stone.

(The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford Illustrated History), Ian Shaw, page 86).

DAFDF3BC-8561-43B6-AA30-03E6BF794601
Djoser’s Step Pyramid was built in the 27th century BC during the Third Dynasty for the burial of Pharaoh Djoser by his vizier, Imhotep.

Exodus (non-archaeological).

The Old Testament drills it into us, that YHWH stretched out his arm and brought the Israelites up out of the land Egypt, thus giving us YHWH and the Bible etc.

And on that very day YHWH brought the people of Israel out of the land of Egypt by their hosts.

Exodus 12:51.

In terms of recorded history there is nothing as real or as important as Moses and the Israelite Exodus from Egypt. Exodus is an eternal or living (non-archaeological) record of the ancient Egyptians and Israelites. To exemplify Exodus’s importance, for example with prehistoric man we have to gather whatever we can from archaeology (or bones and stones). Prehistoric man is non-living.

Exodus.
Exodus.

The Nile Valley is the kingdom of YHWH that Jesus Christ referred to in the Lord’s Prayer. The most famous people in life or on earth are the Americans, however, the most famous people of the afterlife are probably prehistoric, ancient and classical, this is because we know so little about them in life, therefore the opposite will be true in the afterlife. The older you are the more famous and illustrious you are. Therefore because we do not and cannot ever know the names of our Holy Fathers down here on Earth but only in heaven, hence hallowed be your name and on earth as in heaven.

9A3DB5A2-CD7D-411B-9D2A-C00D648AE0D2
Tetragrammaton. The Hebrew name of God transliterated in four letters as YHWH or JHVH and articulated as Yahweh or Jehovah. “He who pronounces the Name with its own letters has no part in the world to come!” Such is the prohibition of pronouncing the Name as written that it is sometimes called the “Ineffable”, “Unutterable”, or “Distinctive Name”. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetragrammaton).

The names of prehistoric men are “Ineffable” and “Unutterable” because we do not and can never know them in life or on earth.


Eternity.

There is no eternity without recorded history, that is that cavemen and prehistoric man (excepting cave art) did not attain eternity because they left no buildings, writing or literature behind. We do not know their names or deeds, so they are not eternal, hence hallowed be your name. However, thanks to themselves and archaeology, it was firstly the Egyptians who invented recorded history and architecture and who put thousands of years of time, energy and devotion into eternity and the afterlife through religion, writing, mummification and tombs etc, that accomplished this. Recorded history is eternity. To reiterate, with the cult of the ruler, funerary cults, mortuary cults, mummification, pyramids, saff-tombs and mastaba-tombs (mastaba meaning “house of eternity” or “eternal house”), the Ancient Egyptians put thousands of years of effort and devotion into the eternal life or afterlife for themselves and the god-kings. We know their names and deeds, hence they are eternal. The ancients actually nailed it with the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead.

Ankh
The ankh is an ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic symbol that was most commonly used in writing and in art to represent the word for “life” and, by extension, as a symbol of life itself. Known as “the key of life” or the “cross of life”, and dating from the Early Dynastic Period (c. 3150 – 2613 BCE), it is also the Egyptian symbol for the “eternal life.”

Self-deification.

In the beginning nobody told Egyptian kings not to exalt themselves, self-deify or make themselves gods. This is what mankind did in the very first place, without any warning, that is they ascribed divinity to the wealthiest and most powerful, this is in contrast to the humble origins of Christ, the true incarnation of YHWH. For example, Nebhepetra Mentuhotep II of the 11th-Dynasty (2055-2004 BC) instituted a programme of self-deification, and was described as ‘the son of Hathor.’

In addition to the emphasis on his lineage, part of Mentuhotep’s strategy to enhance his reputation with his contemporaries and successors was a programme of self-deification. He is described as ‘the son of Hathor’ on two fragments from Gebelein, while at Dendera and Aswan he usurped the headgear of Amun and Min, and elsewhere wears the red crown surmounted by two feathers. At Konosso, near Philae, he took on the guise of ithyphallic Min. Both this iconography and his second Horus name, Netjeryhedjet (‘the divine one of the white crown’), emphasize his self-deification. Evidence from his Deir el-Bahri temple indicates that he intended to be worshipped as a god in his House of Millions of Years, thus pre-dating by hundreds of years ideas that became a central religious preoccupation of the New Kingdom. It is evident that he was reasserting the cult of the ruler.

(The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford Illustrated History), Ian Shaw, page 140).

Egyptian kings self-deified and the ancients ascribed divinity to the wealthiest and most powerful until they figured out that God and divinity works or operates in the opposite or inverse direction, in that it is the poor deserve divinity and not the rich. The ancients then orchestrated the story of the humble origins of Jesus Christ; being born in a manger and the coming of the true incarnation of YHWH to serve and not be served.

The greatest among you will be your servant. For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.

Matthew 23:11-12.

Instead, the greatest among you should be like the youngest, and the one who rules like the one who serves. For who is greater, the one who is at the table or the one who serves? Is it not the one who is at the table? But I am among you as one who serves.

Luke 22:26-27.


Rome.

The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism is also demonstrated by super-rich divine Roman emperors.

Christians, in particular, both ridiculed the very notion that the obviously human emperor was divine and occasionally paid with their lives for their refusal to give him any kind of religious honour. But that is not to say that the divine status of the emperor was unproblematic for pre-Christian Romans or that there were no debates and disagreements about just how godlike the human ruler, let alone his family was. It was another awkward balancing act bequeathed to his successors by Augustus, who straddled the boundary between the human and the divine with greater success than some of those who followed.

Throughout the Roman world, the living emperor was treated very like a god. He was incorporated into rituals celebrated in honour of the gods, he was addressed in language that overlapped with divine language, and he was assumed to have some similar powers. Augustus’ name, for example, was included in the wording of some religious litanies. Runaway slaves could claim asylum by clinging to a statue of the emperor, just as to a statue of a god.

(SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome, Mary Beard, page 429-430).

CDCE2B8F-C654-4BB3-9264-C688F689C42A
In 42 BC, Julius Caesar was formally deified as “the divine Julius” (divus Iulius) after his assassination. His adopted son, Octavian (better known as Augustus, a title given to him 15 years later, in 27 BC) thus became known as divi Iuli filius (son of the divine Julius) or simply divi filius (son of the god). (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divi_filius).

Christianity.

The Jews or Israelites always had the moral of poverty being a noble virtue or the tale of the wiseman and rich man, something which the Romans did not have at all until they adopted Christianity.

Elite Roman writers were mostly disdainful of those less fortunate, and less rich, than themselves. Apart from their nostalgic admiration of a simple peasant way of life – a fantasy of country picnics, and lazy afternoons under shady trees – they found little virtue in poverty or in the poor or even in earning an honest day’s wages.

(SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome, Mary Beard, page 440).

Apart from a very few philosophical extremists, no one in the Roman world seriously believed that poverty was honourable – until the growth of Christianity which we shall explore further in the next chapter. The idea that the rich man might have a problem entering the kingdom of heaven would have seemed as preposterous to those hanging out in our Ostian bar as to the plutocrat in his mansion.

(SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome, Mary Beard, page 471).

1DB9F7F9-D8C5-4240-B6DA-F5569B51109D
As the first Roman emperor to claim conversion to Christianity, Constantine played an influential role in the proclamation of the Edict of Milan in 313, which decreed tolerance for Christianity in the empire. He called the First Council of Nicaea in 325, at which the Nicene Creed was professed by Christians. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_the_Great).

Wealth assessments.

The Roman state was built on wealth in that your status as plebeian or patrician and your eligibility to vote and hold office such as senator or consul was based on financial tests or wealth assessments.

A different set of priorities is reflected in the political institutions attributed to Servius Tullius – sometimes now given the inappropriately grand title of ‘the Servian Constitution’, partly because they were so fundamental to the later working of Roman politics. He is supposed to have been the first to organise a census of the Roman citizens, formally enrolling them in the citizen body and classifying them in different ranks according to their wealth. But more than that, he linked this classification to two further institutions: the Roman army and the organisation of the people for voting and elections.

(SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome, Mary Beard, page 105).

Cicero reflects exactly that when he sums up Servius Tullius’ political objectives in approving tones: ‘He divided the people in this way to ensure that voting power was under the control not of the rabble but of the wealthy, and he saw to it that the greatest number did not have the greatest power – a principle that we should always stand by in politics.’ In fact, this principle came to be vigorously contested in the politics of Rome.

(SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome, Mary Beard, page 109).

4E3A2024-38B9-4510-B7DF-0F99840BD772
Servius Tullius was the legendary sixth king of Rome, and the second of its Etruscan dynasty. He reigned 575–535 BC. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servius_Tullius).

It is easy enough to paint a picture of Republican political processes as completely dominated by the wealthy minority. The upshot of the Conflict of the Orders was not popular revolution but the creation of a new governing class, comprising rich plebeians and patricians. The first qualification for most political offices was wealth on a substantial scale. No one could stand for election without passing a financial test that excluded most citizens; the exact amount needed to qualify is not known, but the implications are that it was set at the very top level of the census hierarchy, the so-called cavalry or equestrian rating.

(SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome, Mary Beard, page 189).

We are still like the Ancient Romans.

It is like a measure, like the Ancient Romans we still measure or rank people’s class, value, worth, honour, respect and esteem according to their wealth. The richer you are the more honours you receive and the more respect you command. But what if like the Buddha and Jesus Christ we did the complete opposite or inverse and measured people’s class, value, worth, honour, respect and esteem by their renunciation of wealth and worldly fashion and their deliberate pursuit of poverty instead? Therefore, what if like Buddhist or Christian monks the poorer you are the more class, value, worth, honour, respect and esteem you command?

The richest man in Rome.

Marcus Licinius Crassus, the Roman plutocrat notoriously remarked that you could count no one rich if he did not have the cash to raise his own private army.

(SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome, Mary Beard, page 25).

3C6724F3-D99C-415E-A57B-EB943314922E
Marcus Licinius Crassus c. 115 BC or 112 BC – 6 May 53 BC) was a Roman general and politician who played a key role in the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. He is often called “The richest man in Rome”. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Licinius_Crassus).

The New Testament.

The Biblical Land (Nile Valley) is the kingdom of YHWH and the key to understanding Judaism and Christianity. If you do Egypt you do Israel. The Biblical Land (Nile Valley) and the Holy Land (Levant) are both the Old Testament, and are truly ancient, while Rome is the New Testament and was founded only in 753 BC.

Joseph interpreting Pharaoh’s dream.
Joseph interpreting Pharaoh’s dream.

Catholicism.

I am Church of England, but next to a Christian I would be a Buddhist. However, concerning the schism in Christianity, Catholicism and Rome are more southern and are closer to the Nile Valley, North Africa and the Near East. I have read one book on the reformation and it revealed nothing to me as to who was right. However, to me a connection to the kingdom of YHWH would be better.

Pyramids of Giza.
Pyramids of Giza.

Conclusion.

Through this inverse of deserved divinity, from Egyptian god-kings to Jesus Christ (that is that the poor deserve divinity and not the rich), the ancients actually nailed eternity. The message of Jesus Christ’s birth, life and death, that is being born in a manger and the coming of the true incarnation of YHWH to serve and not to be served and dying for the forgiveness of sins, matches the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism, which is that the poorer you are the more native you are. There is an etymological and ideological connection between nativity and nativism. The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism is a historical lesson for mankind. The examples given above show that in the first place humanity instinctively ascribed divinity to the most wealthy and powerful. Jesus Christ and the Buddha both proved that divinity thinks or points in the inverse or opposite direction to capitalism or instincts, in that it is the poor who deserve divinity and not the rich. Jesus Christ and the Buddha both deserved divinity.


Yours will be done.

Yours will be done obviously means we do whatever YHWH commands us, that possibly being to create the kingdom on earth as in heaven. As above so below.

On earth as in heaven.

It is not only about having no money, it is about having no desire for money, therefore, apart from the obvious, this also means we should live on earth as in heaven, that is we should never care about money. For example because everyone (on earth) wants something that the Queen has, that is money, therefore she wins and she is important, however, if everybody (on earth) had no desire for money, (as in heaven), then the Queen would not win and she would not be that important, (as in heaven). It also means the Lord’s Prayer is down to earth.

Daily bread.

Daily bread is all you need, that is you do not need riches to be in the kingdom of heaven.


The forgiveness of sins.

On hearing this, Jesus said to them, “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”

Mark 2:17.

Therefore I am not dealing with minor or petty sin such as Mother Teresa feeling contrite and repentant for taking the largest slice of cake.

Petty sin.
Go to hell!

Nor am I concerned about such as British Prime Minister Theresa May who in an interview with Julie Etchingham on ITV’s Tonight programme on 5 June 2017, said the naughtiest thing she had ever done was to ‘run through fields of wheat’ as a child.

(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Running_through_fields_of_wheat).

0FCD255E-C893-4E76-B7C5-EBD878779965
Who cares?

I am dealing with real sin such as crimes against humanity, genocide, homicide, child molestation and rape etc. The idea is that it does not get any worse than the above, and if you can fix such as the above then nothing is really a problem and therefore, all sin is fixed.

Light.

And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

Genesis 1:3.

The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism is the forgiveness of sins for many reasons:

  1. Sin is accidental.
  2. Good guys can go deranged (trust me).
  3. Rape, murder and cannibalism are no sweat with prehistoric men.
  4. Sin and guilt are good because early or primitive hominins and animals were/are ignorant of sin and did/do not feel guilt. Sin is intrinsically good because it is by definition non-animal. YHWH loves and is amazed by humans because we are not animals, we are not ignorant of sin and we feel guilt.
  5. Guilt is human. Guilt is good.
  6. YHWH may love humans because of his eternal perspective, rather than looking at humans as the maximum they can be, that is non-animal, divine beings, he may look at them as the minimum they can be, that is beautiful primates. Humans are much more impressive and lovable from this perspective. Hence, this may be why or how YHWH can forgive us more easily.
  7. You cannot sin unless you are conscious of sin. That is that children and animals cannot sin. Therefore, the more advanced (or rich or adult) you are the more responsible you are and therefore the more guilty you are of sin, therefore, the more primitive (or poor or younger) you are the less responsible you are and therefore the less guilty you are of sin. This has several meanings:
  8. The older (or more adult) you are the more advanced you are therefore the more responsible you are and therefore more guilty you are of sin, while the younger (or more juvenile) you are the more primitive you are therefore the less responsible you are and therefore the less guilty of you are of sin. That is that adults get into more trouble than kids.
  9. Conversely the older you are the more primitive you are (as in our technophobe grandparents or our ancestors) and the younger or more modern you are the more advanced or smart you are (as in the current tech-savvy youth, the state-of-the-art and the cutting edge).
  10. It does not matter to God if a primitive animal kills another animal or even a human and similarly it was less of an issue for primitive prehistoric people to kill another human than it is for advanced modern people to do so today. We advanced modern people get in much more trouble with YHWH for such acts today, as we should know better.
  11. It is also the reason why Islam and the Muslim world can get away with violence, such as terrorism and punishment such as amputation for thieves, while the Christian and capitalist western countries cannot use violence. Why? Because Islam is primitive and the west is advanced.
  12. It is also the reason why rich people such as the Queen have to have such good manners and elocution, while the poor lower classes can have thick accents and can comically get away with murder with foul language and vulgar humour. The lower class can say or do what they like. This is another reason why politically accurate people deliberately pursue poverty and lower status.
  13. Africans are funny because they are primitive, like animals or prehistoric man, for example, certain things that are taboo or sinful in the UK are no sweat in the continent of Africa. For example drink driving (especially in the bush) is not an issue there, where as in the UK it is very serious. Why is such as drink driving acceptable in Africa, but not in the UK? Because Africa is more primitive and the UK is more advanced. Which would you prefer?
  14. Animals such as dogs are funny because they never think about sharing food, they just go for the belly or the energy of life, that is the fats, protein and nutrients etc, without even considering another dog. Therefore, if someone who commits a sin makes themselves equal to animals, this animal comedy lightens his/her sins and hence he/she is forgiven.
  15. If someone who commits a sin (such as Jeffrey Dahmer) does not try to be advanced, special or superior to animals and instead becomes, thinks, acts or accepts that he/she is primitive, prehistoric or even animal, then his or her sin is much lighter or even forgiven.
  16. For example, because Jeffrey Dahmer was a cannibal, therefore the only thing he can be or equate to is a prehistoric man such as Homo antecessor or an animal. If he accepts this then his sins are lighter.
  17. The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism is without sin because it pays every single last penny, this is because natives or primitives such as bushmen or prehistoric man are/were literally penniless.

https://giveeverythingaway.com

Mesolithic man.
Mesolithic man.

Parable of The Golden Human.

Imagine if someone won the lottery and gave every last penny of it away. Is there reward in heaven for such an act? What this human did goes against every animal instinct. He or she goes against nature. This human is golden.

Give everything away.

This hypothesis determines that if a serial killer like Jeffrey Dahmer really wanted forgiveness, then if he thought like or accepted that he was an animal, say a raccoon, and gave away every last penny and possession that he owned, he might lighten his sins and be forgiven.

Think differently to animals.


Genesis and Charles Darwin’s Origins of species.

There is a paradoxical connection between Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species and his theory of evolution by natural selection and Genesis or creationism. Apart from the ubiquitous fact which everyone knows, that being that Charles Darwin’s discovery of natural selection nullified or made redundant Genesis or creationism, there is actually a connection that makes the two not too dissimilar or totally incompatible. This subtle connection is primitivism. 

715C6BBF-D85B-4380-B96D-BB108CF0F1A6
Charles Darwin’s Origins of species.

‘In the beginning’ nobody told cavemen not to be harsh, nobody told cavemen not to steal, nobody told cavemen not to rape, nobody told cavemen not to murder and nobody told cavemen not to cannibalise. Therefore, rape, murder and cannibalism are no sweat with prehistoric men. Primitive hominids and prehistoric men had no Ten Commandments. How did they figure out or learn all these things are wrong?

36715E1A-B674-4255-8185-63AFE8A646FA
Paleozoic Landscape.

Life has existed on this planet for 3.5 billion years, and in all that time, probably the majority of wild animals have either killed and eaten other animals, or been killed and eaten by other wild animals. Therefore, in contact with humans (or other animals), all wild animals automatically presume the worst, that is that you are going to kill them and eat them. We have all seen how for example a crab acts defensively and makes itself bigger by extending it claws when a child is playing with it at the seashore, the crab does not understand that the child is ‘playing’. Or for example how a trapped wild animal, such as a bird or rabbit reacts to you trying to help it. Because they have no language, no matter what you do you cannot explain to that animal that you are not trying to kill it, but that you are trying to help it. Animals just do not understand that another animal species would try to help them. There is no such thing as trust between wild animals. After 3.5 billion years of viciousness, violence, I have bigger teeth than you, and eat or be eaten, animals do not trust us in the slightest. Therefore, how much do you think YHWH will appreciate the fact that one animal species has trust and does not necessarily and automatically kill and eat every other animal that it sees? It is not an automatic guarantee that humans will kill every animal they see, infact 99.9% of the time they will not, as there is no reason to. You cannot predict a human. We think about it and we are compassionate and magnanimous toward wild animals. For this reason YHWH will have mercy toward you.

Print
Cambrian explosion.

‪Concerning sin and forgiveness one must have the eyes of YHWH or His perspective of evolution or creation. If the history of the earth was crammed into one day, modern humans have been around since 11:58:43 pm.

History of the earth in 24 hours.
History of the earth in 24 hours.

Humans are not animals or at least they have not been for a million years and YHWH knows this or can see this in a blink of an eye or in a way that we cannot see. YHWH waited billions of years or for nearly an eternity simply for a living being to feel guilt or remorse.

5CA920BB-6692-4297-939B-4642DE3529A7
Cambrian explosion.

That being is by definition non-animal. YHWH has seen it all. Compared to the animal kingdom we are marvellous. YHWH may love humans because of his eternal perspective, rather than looking at humans as the maximum they can be, that is non-animal, divine beings, he may look at them as the minimum they can be, that is beautiful primates. Humans are much more impressive and lovable from this perspective. Hence, this may be why or how YHWH can forgive us more easily. To reiterate YHWH is amazed by you because you are not animal and you feel guilt, therefore, YHWH will forgive you any sin. However, the consequence is that if someone sins against you, you cannot have the eyes of YHWH or His perspective of creation until you forgive first.‬

If someone sins against you say I get the eyes of YHWH for forgiveness and so do you. (I am not talking about the largest slice of cake, but such as Jeffrey Dahmer). Note the similarity with forgive us our sins, as we have forgiven those who sin against us.

4E5260AA-5799-4D70-87E6-7EBA43607B2E
The eyes of YHWH.

All crime is accidental.

All crime is accidental is forgiveness, in that if someone assaults you or burgles your house, no matter what, we are supposed to instantly forgive and to say or believe that all crime is accidental. This is because in heaven this is true and we are supposed to think higher than or for criminals and have the higher perspective of YHWH. From YHWH’s perspective, all crime is accidental.

“Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, ‘Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? Up to seven times?’ Jesus answered, ‘I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.'”

Matthew 18: 21-22.

Primitivism.

Sub-Saharan Africa and other parts of the world can give us many examples of primitivism, for example Africans are funny like prehistoric man and animals because they are poor and primitive, therefore they can get away with things we advanced first world people cannot. Remember rape, murder and cannibalism are no sweat with prehistoric men, similarly, many things that are taboo, sinful or illegal in the UK are no sweat in the continent of Africa.

4D0650C9-D542-40E5-9E93-1E6D20E72A6C
Tro-tro, a form of transport in Ghana.

Drink driving.

For example drink driving (especially the bush) is not an issue in the continent of Africa, where as in the UK it is a very serious offence. Even in capital cities such offences are handled with a £50-100 bribe to the police.

Traffic lights.

Traffic lights are not observed for motorbikes in Africa, everybody does it and it is not a problem.

MOTs or Road Worthiness Certificates.

MOTs or Road Worthiness Certificates are no where near of the same high standards or calibre of the UK. To get a Road Worthiness Certificate all you have to do is pay (ahem bribe) someone then he doesn’t even check the car and gives you the certificate. A high percentage of cars in Africa would never be deemed road worthy in the UK. In Africa it is a case of if she goes, she goes. No palaver! The risk is worth it.

People leave the Damara, the last strate
Road worthy vehicle, Africa.

Insurance.

Vehicle insurance is extremely cheap in Africa, it has to be as nobody can afford it, and for the country to function properly people need to get around quickly, despite the risks. I’m talking like £10-15 for 750cc motorbike insurance. You see many ‘road worthy’ cars in Africa with severe body damage and unfixed signs of collisions.

1C69CA9A-3121-47A6-B77F-57E1D4E0E355
Road worthy vehicle, Africa.

Speeding tickets.

Like drink driving, speeding tickets are simply handled at the side of the road with a bribe to the police.

Driving licences.

Driving licenses are given to you even if you have no corresponding category license in the UK or EU, for example although I have had a driving licence in the UK since 1998, I had never ridden a motorbike in my life until 2012 in Ghana. I got a license simply by asking the man in charge of license dispensation. I did not take a test. I literally drove around the block to get the hang of a 750 cc bike, then spent a few days driving around Accra, and then to a more distant village called Abandze, a couple of hours away from Accra, and then I was done. All with an instructor sharing the one bike and one helmet. All in all it took less than a week to go from a total beginner to be a competent motorcyclist.

Helmets, L plates and high-viz attire.

Similar to red traffic lights, although wearing helmets for motorbikes is compulsory and the police do sometimes of enforce it, most motorcyclists in Africa flagrantly ignore this rule. When learning to ride a motorbike in Ghana in 2012 my ‘instructor’ and I shared one bike and one helmet. Also, there are no L plates or over dramatic high-viz vests etc.

African motorcyclists.

Indecent exposure.

Also public nakedness is no issue for Africans in the continent of Africa whatsoever, it is not rude or pornographic, even in capital cities, (I saw full male nudity in Accra in 2012) where as public nakedness for white people in the UK (or anywhere else), is rude, pornographic, unacceptable and would lead to your arrest for indecent exposure.

485064A0-D195-4917-B11E-21FC947370A9
Naked native Africans.

To explain differences in nudity perspectives between Africans and the Europeans consider the following. Why are Europeans advanced and Africans primitive? It could possibly be down to temperature and climate. In tropical Africa you can relax about the predictable temperature and less extreme seasons. Being in the perennial warmth and humid climates of sub-Saharan Africa is not the same as being in the freezing wildernesses of Northern Europe. Europeans are native to the cold. It was probably a lot harder to live and survive in temperate or arctic climates during the winter seasons (for European prehistoric people), so they probably had to use more ingenuity, planning, storing and construction to stay warm and alive during such freezing winter months. Where as in tropical Africa one can relax more and have a more laid back attitude towards the climate and seasons. Obviously the cold temperatures and climate made Europeans white as well, as the further north prehistoric men trekked, the more vitamin D they required and the lighter they got over the generations, due to natural selection. Northern Europeans have many slang words for cold temperatures that Africans have probably rarely used, for example: Chilly! Nippy! Bitter! Frosty! Freezing! Baltic! Arctic! Nithering! Knackering! Biting! Bitch cold! Bollocking! If the reason the Europeans are advanced and the Africans are primitive is not down to climate or temperature, then what else is it? For example, to fully explain the difference in nudity perspectives between Africans and Europeans, temperature is probably the reason why it is not rude or pornographic and is totally acceptable for Africans to be naked in public, even in metropolises, while is it absolutely shocking, rude, pornographic and totally unacceptable for white people to be naked in public anywhere. This is because evolutionarily, it was always absolutely imperative for white people to have clothes or skins to protect themselves from the freezing cold temperatures, where as Africans are never cold, therefore the impetus for Africans to have clothes or skins is no where near as imperative as Europeans, having such milder elements and being in such warmer and humid climates.

DC7C703C-D793-4FCC-A710-2ABEE2ACBFBB
Naked native African.

Adam and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.

Genesis 2:25.

Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realised that they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.

Genesis 3:7.

The Lord God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them. And the Lord God said, ‘The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil.’

Genesis 3:21-22.

White people feel much shame when naked while Africans do not, therefore this determines that white people have eaten the forbidden fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, while Africans have not. This also determines that Africa could be the Garden of Eden.

Health and safety, hazards and death traps.

I once walked over a makeshift 1 ft wide by 100 ft wooden plank bridge across a bottomless railway bridge over a valley between two opposing train tracks in Accra, Ghana in 2010. I was terrified. Needless to say the health and safety, hazard and death trap issues would lead to the immediate removal of the plank bridge in the UK. Where as in Africa it is absolutely fine and serves a useful local function. It would be taken down in the UK because:

  1. It is a dangerous 1ft wide plank bridge across a bottomless railway bridge over a ravine.
  2. It is in between and parallel to two opposing train tracks.
Ian Britton
Railway warning sign.

Planning permission.

There are other parts of the world where people are still primitive, for example Papua New Guinea. The native Papuans make rope bridges across gorges purely from natural materials such as tree vines. Imagine if the native Papuans had to get planning permission and fill out forms and endless red tape in order to build a bridge. It would be unethical as well as undesirable to do so. In the UK obviously health and safety regulations would never allow such a death trap structure to be built, where as the native Papuans do not care, the risk is worth it.

90158D89-2116-4139-8A83-ABE7686FBB3E
Mountain bridge, Papua New Guinea highlands.

Fox hunting.

A recent innovation in the UK was the ban of fox hunting. This kind of activity would not really be an issue in the continent of Africa. People still hunt there for subsistence. Again the UK is so advanced, has such high standards and has so much ethics that it has become a bit soft.

89BA2F01-5D43-403E-A7E7-E6FFFEB2E385
Bushmen hunters.

Recycling.

Another recent innovation in the UK is recycling, in that every homeowner in the UK has to recycle their garbage, where as in Africa recycling is not a priority of life and would not be entertained.

AC0CEBF3-1B98-45C5-A71B-F67C20A8BDEC
Recycling sign.

Dog fouling.

Because the UK has such high standards another recent innovation in the UK is a law that stipulates that dog owners must clean up their dog’s waste on public land. This would never be even entertained in Africa.

97B5F292-CE54-4257-8953-8E77AAED09CD
Dog fouling notice.

Smoking.

Another recent innovation in the UK is the ban on smoking in public buildings, the UK has such high standards that you can no longer enjoy a cigarette, cigar or even an e-cigarette in an airport or a pub. Also the tax on tobacco products in the UK is so extortionate that most people cannot even afford to smoke. It is near £10 for a packet of 20 cigarettes in the UK, where as it is less than 50p in Ghana. Smoking in bars is no problem in Africa either. I know smoking is bad for you, but really it’s just high standards.

Tourism.

Ecstasy is an important part of the tourist economy of Ibiza, and the police take a relaxed stance toward it. If the police in Ibiza catch you with ecstasy, they simply take it off you. In the UK ecstasy is taken much more seriously and sentences are handed down, even for people carrying for friends (intent to supply). Why or how is Ibiza able to more or less overlook ecstasy dealing and use and the UK not? Because Ibiza is more primitive and the UK is more advanced. Similarly, imagine if ecstasy was prevalent in Africa, the odd accidental death (once a decade) from an ecstasy overdose would not be grounds enough to ruin the whole tourist industry, the risk is worth it! In the UK such accidents are headline news!

Why are all these things acceptable in Africa other parts of the world, but not in the UK? Because Africa and other countries are more primitive and the UK is more advanced. Which would you prefer?

Because I grew up in the Ashanti region of Ghana from 1985 onwards and because of my family having a permanent residence in Ghana for over 30 years (through my Father’s employment), I can tell you I prefer Africa in many ways. This might demonstrate that having such high living standards in the UK, is not necessarily a better way of life.

All crime is accidental.

There are limitless examples of how Africa and other parts of the world are primitive and metaphorically get away with murder when it comes to ethics, health and safety hazards and death trap structures and vehicles etc. Primitivism should be studied where it is still present in the world, as we can learn a lot from examples. For example, imagine if there was an incident in a gold mine in Africa, and there was a fatality, imagine if this was down to negligence or shoddy work on the part on an African. In Africa this would be an acceptable accident, but in the UK, heads would role! The UK is so advanced and has such high standards, that the only upshot is that the UK gets into much more trouble for ‘accidents.’ Advancement does not necessarily mean better.

You cannot sin unless you are conscious of sin. That is that children and animals cannot sin. Therefore, the more advanced (or rich or adult) you are the more responsible you are and therefore the more guilty you are of sin, therefore, the more primitive (or poor or younger) you are the less responsible you are and therefore the less guilty you are of sin.

Prehistoric man’s questions.

  1. Why did humans not come with all knowledge of what is good and what is evil from the beginning?
  2. Why did humans have no ethics and morality right from the start?
  3. Why were humans not perfect angels from the beginning?
  4. Why did humans have to evolve out of vicious animals?
  5. Why did humans have to learn the hard way?
  6. Why does life on a planet start out evil and then progressively become good?
  7. Why must there be hell before heaven?
  8. Why do humans have to die before they attain eternal bliss?
  9. Why can’t humans attain nirvana like Christ and the Buddha before they die?

We living creatures of life receive no help from YHWH or anyone whatsoever, we are on our own, we are 100% independent and we learn on our own through natural selection and evolution.

C3BADA90-E6DF-4FF1-8E5F-33B312D853A0
The tree of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden of Eden bearing the forbidden fruit which Adam and Eve disobediently ate.

At what point in evolutionary terms does killing another member of the same species become murder? For example Homo erectus or Homo antecessor did not feel any guilt or remorse for killing or cannibalising another member of the same species, and it was never murder. To reiterate, rape, murder and cannibalism are no sweat with prehistoric men. However, at some point YHWH had had enough and then more evolved or advanced hominins began to feel guilt or remorse for so called ‘murder’ or ‘cannibalism.’ It was only through natural selection, through learning the hard way, through the sins of early hominins and prehistoric man that we learned ethics and morality and gained knowledge of what is good and what is evil.

3600FE92-EE44-4E78-8DF7-4D3E8D649786
The tree of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden of Eden bearing the forbidden fruit which Adam and Eve disobediently ate.

That is what humans do, we bravely come here without consent to learn about sin for YHWH. Humans are brave, we feel unpleasant things like guilt, shame, embarrassment, wrath, anger and hate then we die.

Lead us not into temptation (YHWH does not warn us).

What does lead us not into temptation of the Lord’s Prayer mean?

And the Lord God commanded the man, ‘You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.

Genesis 2:16-17.

In the beginning nobody told caveman what was good and what was evil. That is our primitive animal ancestors had no knowledge of good and evil. They were just vicious animals.

CF5BC37B-4733-4AB3-ADD5-0C14C5939162
The tree of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden of Eden bearing the forbidden fruit which Adam and Eve disobediently ate.

If I were a caveman who got punished for killing another caveman, I would say to YHWH, why didn’t you tell me? Therefore, it means that because YHWH does not warn us, hence, lead us not into temptation. For example nobody told caveman ‘thou shalt not steal’ and ‘thou shalt not kill’ etc and therefore he obviously stole and killed etc. We only learn ourselves by doing these things, and because there is no warning, therefore, there is a second chance.

‘You will not certainly die,’ the snake said to the woman. ‘For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.

Genesis 3:4-5.

Because nobody gave humans the knowledge of all things that are good and evil from the beginning, because we had to learn the hard way by evolving out of vicious animals (through natural selection) and because YHWH does not warn us, therefore, lead us not into temptation. Because there is no warning of sin, therefore, there is forgiveness and a second chance. The second chance is the afterlife. Cavemen certainly needed a second chance. Who doesn’t need a second chance apart from Jesus Christ?

Jesus carrying the cross.
Jesus carrying the cross.

Guilt is good.

Humans should compare themselves to animals more often and appreciate themselves. Compared to the animal kingdom we are awesome. But hypocritically we humans should not make ourselves superior to animals, as it is not healthy. YHWH does not really care, in fact YHWH loves it when you make yourself not superior to animals. To make yourself equal to animals is very modest and humble, and as mentioned the more advanced (or rich) you are the more responsible you are and therefore the more guilty you are of sin, therefore, the more primitive (or poor) you are the less responsible you are and therefore the less guilty you are of sin. What is more impressive to YHWH a human who feels guilt or an animal who feels guilt? YHWH loves humans because of his perspective of humans, instead of looking at humans as semi-divine beings, he looks at them as very impressive primates. Humans are much more impressive and lovable from this perspective of YHWH. This why or how YHWH can forgive us more less any sin. We know that if we ever sin or commit a crime that humans are better than the animal kingdom because we feel guilt. Do not think of Jesus Christ all the time, because he was without sin, think of prehistoric men because they did much sin. If you have sinned do not be too advanced, special or a supreme being, be primitive, prehistoric or even animal and then your sin is much lighter or even forgiven. God loves and is amazed by humans because we are not animals and we feel guilt. Guilt is human. Guilt is good.

The Lord God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them. And the Lord God said, ‘The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil.’

Genesis 3:21-22.

Prehistoric man.
Prehistoric man.

You cannot sin unless you are conscious of sin.

To YHWH the knowledge of sin is intrinsically noble and good because animals are completely ignorant of sin. You cannot sin unless you are conscious of sin. That is that children and animals cannot sin. Also for example, if someone is tricked into consuming human flesh, by being given meat and told it is kangaroo meat when it is actually human flesh and then that person eats it, in this scenario because that person who eats it is not conscious of the fact that they have consumed human flesh, then they have not sinned and no sin has been committed. Therefore, the idea or concept of sin is intrinsically noble and good. After billions of years of evolution of life on Earth, YHWH simply appreciates the fact that one animal species is not wholly ignorant of sin. (Notice we have to say “wholly” because of the Holocaust). Early hominins or hominids did not sin because they were ignorant of sin. In a way despite the viciousness and violence the animal kingdom is perfect or without sin.

952A8E25-28F5-4173-B4D9-81B6670768F4
Cambrian explosion.

Sin is intrinsically good because it is by definition non-animal.

Sin is human because humans have knowledge of sin, and because we have knowledge of sin we are non-animal. That is what is amazing about sin, because only non-animals know they have sinned. Homo sapiens are awesome because they do not have to care about sin, nobody makes them, and there is no reason why they should care. What is the benefit of knowing? It is a miracle we know about sin at all. We could be animals and get away with sin. That is what is amazing about sin, because the idea or knowledge of it is by definition non-animal. It is miraculous because we do not have to care about sin. It is intrinsically noble and good that one animal species has taken it upon itself to know and learn about sin for YHWH. That is what humans are, that is the difference between humans and animals. Sin is beautiful. Animals do not feel guilt. Guilt is good.

Prehistoric man.
Prehistoric man.

Darwin’s deal.

The deal is that if you have knowledge of sin (or good and evil) then you will be more technologically advanced, however, the catch of the deal is that you will get into much more trouble for sins than primitive animals.

Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realised that they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.

Genesis 3:7.


Parable of Two Debtors.

And Jesus answered him, “Simon, I have something to say to you.” And he replied, “Say it, Teacher.” “A moneylender had two debtors: one owed five hundred denarii, and the other fifty. When they were unable to repay, he graciously forgave them both. So which of them will love him more?” Simon answered and said, “I suppose the one whom he forgave more.” And He said to him, “You have judged correctly.” Turning toward the woman, He said to Simon, “Do you see this woman? I entered your house; you gave Me no water for My feet, but she has wet My feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair. You gave Me no kiss; but she, since the time I came in, has not ceased to kiss My feet. You did not anoint My head with oil, but she anointed My feet with perfume. For this reason I say to you, her sins, which are many, have been forgiven, for she loved much; but he who is forgiven little, loves little.” Then He said to her, “Your sins have been forgiven.” Those who were reclining at the table with Him began to say to themselves, “Who is this man who even forgives sins?” And He said to the woman, “Your faith has saved you; go in peace.”

Luke 7:40-43.

The parable of the two debtors.
The parable of the two debtors.

Hitler.

The problem with Hitler is that he could not tell the difference between humans and animals, as in he treated “non-aryans” such as Jews and Slavs as worthless as or even less worth than animals. For example, “Blondi” was Adolf Hitler’s German Shepherd, a gift as a puppy from Martin Bormann in 1941. The fact that Hitler treated human beings worse than animals, means that he could not even tell the difference between them, and there is nothing else to the matter. This is the reason why today white people cannot even tell the difference between white men and black men.

Anything except an ape.

Animals such as dogs are funny because they never think about sharing food, they just go for the belly or the energy of life, that is the fats, protein and nutrients etc, without even considering another dog. Therefore for the sins we do not like to forgive, for example the Holocaust, serial killers and child abusers, the way to forgive them is to call them prehistoric man, primitive or animals. For example Hitler is a cold blooded killer, he could be something like a soulless and remorseless great white shark?

The great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias).
The great white shark (Carcharodon carcharias).

Accurate, but not that funny. Or what about if Hitler was a deep sea creature, some creepy luminous ghoul from deepest recesses of the bottomless dark abyss?

Deep sea creature.
Deep sea creature.

Nah!

Because Hitler could not tell the difference between humans and animals, and because he treated a German Shepherd better 6 million humans, could he be a canine?

Adolf Hitler und Eva Braun auf dem Berghof
Blondi was Adolf Hitler’s German Shepherd, a gift as a puppy from Martin Bormann in 1941. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blondi).

Nah!

In reality, because Hitler cares so much about racism and subhumans, he is probably an ape or an archaic hominin such as a German Neanderthal. Hitler might even be impressive as a proud primate?

05F5187B-F203-4405-B777-1F547814448C
Take your pick!

The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism is all about YHWH, prehistory, evolution, species, race, animals, comedy, money and forgiveness. Why is it we humans hate our own evolutionary past? Why would we rather be anything except an ape?


Buddhism.

The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism is never nationalist, nazi or hard like a skinhead. It is based and founded entirely on religion such as Judaism, Islam, Buddhism and Christianity. Therefore, it is very compassionate, kind, charitable (even to non-natives) and gentle like a Buddhist or Christian monk. However, this does not mean we are anti-racist, or obsequiously kind and charitable to the point of giving our own country and women away to non-natives.

EB831575-381D-4D41-A067-AFB1C7EB8433
Buddhist monk.

Parable of the Golden Politician.

Imagine if a far-right politician such as Nick Griffin became a full on mendicant Buddhist monk, that is renounced all of his wealth, donned the orange or crimson robes, shaved his head, promised to let go of his attachments to all social conventions, promised to keep the 5 precepts, followed the Vinaya (the rules Buddha put together for monks to follow), yet crucially was still far-right and politically active. Would anti-fascists still boo, jeer, milkshake, intimidate and beat up a Buddhist monk? Analogously, this is honestly the type of devotion, faith and sacrifice that is required from us far-right people in order to save native white people and to prove 100% our beliefs, virtues and convictions. This is what the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism is all about and requires of us.

Hitler again.

Similarly, would you forgive Adolf Hitler if he renounced all his wealth and became a full on mendicant and ascetic Buddhist monk?

9C93297C-F6C4-463B-B036-FCAD98331827
Buddhist monk.

Yes!

Light.

And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

Genesis 1:3.

Because Jeffrey Dahmer was a cannibal, therefore the only thing he can be or equate to is a prehistoric man such as Homo antecessor or an animal. This is the only place he can be at ease, forgiven or accepted. If he accepts this then his sins are lighter.

87D32578-80C7-40D8-AB48-EEFF499C01C2
Reconstruction of a female Homo antecessor from Atapuerca practicing cannibalism (Ibeas Museum, Burgos, Spain)

The only way I can understand a serial killer such as Jeffrey Dahmer with any comedy or lightness is if he were an animal like a raccoon. So if Jeffrey Dahmer was a raccoon would we forgive him?

Raccoon.
Raccoon, (Procyon lotor).

Yes!

Think differently to animals.


“For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins.”

Matthew 6: 14-15.

“In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the riches of God’s grace.”

Ephesians 1:7.

“If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.”

1 John 1:9.

“Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven.”

Luke 6:37.

“Get rid of all bitterness, rage and anger, brawling and slander, along with every form of malice. Be kind and compassionate to one another, forgiving each other, just as in Christ God forgave you.”

Ephesians 4: 31-32.

“Bear with each other and forgive one another if any of you has a grievance against someone. Forgive as the Lord forgave you.”

Colossians 3:13.

“And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive them, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins.”

Mark 11:25.

And therefore what does YHWH say to us all?

”Hard luck mate, you’re on your own!”


The Last Supper

A mosaic of the Last Supper and first Eucharist adorns the chapel at the Benedictine Sisters of Perpetual Adoration monastery in Clyde Missouri
A mosaic of the Last Supper and first Eucharist adorns the chapel at the Benedictine Sisters of Perpetual Adoration monastery in Clyde Missouri.

On the first day of the Festival of Unleavened Bread, the disciples came to Jesus and asked, “Where do you want us to make preparations for you to eat the Passover?”

He replied, “Go into the city to a certain man and tell him, ‘The Teacher says: My appointed time is near. I am going to celebrate the Passover with my disciples at your house.’” So the disciples did as Jesus had directed them and prepared the Passover.

When evening came, Jesus was reclining at the table with the Twelve. And while they were eating, he said, “Truly I tell you, one of you will betray me.”

They were very sad and began to say to him one after the other, “Surely you don’t mean me, Lord?”

Jesus replied, “The one who has dipped his hand into the bowl with me will betray me. The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born.”

Then Judas, the one who would betray him, said, “Surely you don’t mean me, Rabbi?”

Jesus answered, “You have said so.”

While they were eating, Jesus took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to his disciples, saying, “Take and eat; this is my body.”

Then he took a cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. I tell you, I will not drink from this fruit of the vine from now on until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.”

When they had sung a hymn, they went out to the Mount of Olives.

Matthew 26:17-30.

A6471EDC-DC4E-4DE5-8099-8FA7C826CE1C
The Holy Grail.

Conclusion.

To reiterate sin and guilt are good because animals are not aware of sin and do not feel guilt. Knowledge of sin is non-animal. Compared to the animal kingdom we are awesome. YHWH loves and is amazed by humans because we are not animals and we feel guilt. Guilt is human. Guilt is good. If you have sinned do not be too advanced, special or a supreme being, be primitive, prehistoric or even animal and then your sin is much lighter or even forgiven. Think differently to animals.


Lead us not into temptation (YHWH does not warn us).

What does lead us not into temptation of the Lord’s Prayer mean?

To reiterate it means that because YHWH does not warn us, hence, lead us not into temptation. For example nobody told caveman ‘thou shalt not steal’ and ‘thou shalt not kill’ etc and therefore he obviously stole and killed etc. We only learn ourselves by doing these things, and because there is no warning, therefore, there is a second chance. Because nobody gave us the knowledge of all things that are good and evil from the beginning, because we had to learn the hard way by evolving out of vicious animals (through natural selection) and because YHWH does not warn us, therefore, lead us not into temptation.

Deliver us from Evil.

This means concerning knowledge of good and evil, lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.


Fulfilment.

Jesus came to fulfill the predictions of the prophets, who had long foretold that a Savior would one day appear. He came to fulfill the ceremonial law, by becoming the great sacrifice for sin, to which all the Old Testament offerings had ever pointed. He came to fulfill the moral law, by yielding to it a perfect obedience, which we could never have yielded – and by paying the penalty for our breaking of it with His atoning blood, which we could never have paid.

J.C. Ryle

https://www.christianity.com/jesus/is-jesus-god/old-testament-prophecies/how-did-jesus-fulfill-the-old-testament.html

It is written: “And he was numbered with the transgressors”; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfilment.

Luke 22:37.

“Don’t think that I came to destroy the law, or the prophets. I didn’t come to destroy, but to fulfill.”

Mathew 5:17.

And so was fulfilled what the Lord had said through the prophet: “Out of Egypt I called my son.”

Matthew 2:15.

Flight into Egypt.

Then Jesus came from Galilee to the Jordan to be baptized by John. But John tried to deter him, saying, “I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?” But Jesus answered him, “Let it be so now, for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness.” Then he consented.

Matthew 3:13-15.

Notice the inverse of deserved divinity. John said it should be Jesus who baptises him, and not the other way round.

Donkey.

As they approached Jerusalem and came to Bethphage on the Mount of Olives, Jesus sent two disciples, saying to them, “Go to the village ahead of you, and at once you will find a donkey tied there, with her colt by her. Untie them and bring them to me. If anyone says anything to you, say that the Lord needs them, and he will send them right away.” This took place to fulfill what was spoken through the prophet:

“Say to Daughter Zion,

‘See, your king comes to you,

gentle and riding on a donkey,

and on a colt, the foal of a donkey.’”

Matthew 21:1-5.

Jesus enters Jerusalem.
Jesus Christ enters Jerusalem.

Notice the inverse of deserved divinity. Why did Jesus Christ not come riding in a golden chariot with a mighty throng of soldiers? Like a Roman victory parade? It is because it would have been vain.

It is about doing it, if it were prophesied that a king would come riding on a donkey, then it is about jumping on a donkey and fulfilling that prophecy. There are other examples of Jesus Christ fulfilling the Old Testament.

What if like the donkey above it were possible to bring the kingdom of YHWH, on earth as in heaven, which could last forever? It could be possible by fulfilling the Lord’s Prayer, by giving the kingdom, the political power and the national glory back to Britain, back to Spain, back to France, back to Rome, back to Greece, back to Israel and back to Egypt. Back! As in Jesus Christ could come back and save Europe.

“Blessed is the coming kingdom of our father David!”

“Hosanna in the highest heaven!”

Mark 11:10.

Jesus enters Jerusalem.
Jesus Christ enters Jerusalem.

Look back instead of forward.

Because the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism points or thinks in the opposite or inverse direction of capitalism or instincts it determines that it is about looking back, for example the Americans should look back to the British, and the British should look back the Germans, and the Germans should look back to the Italians, and the Italians should look back to Greeks and the Greeks should look back to the Israelis (or Near East) and the Israelis should look back to the Egyptians and the Egyptians should look back to no one.

This is easy to do for everyone except the Americans, because of the American revolution and the War of Independence, Americans never look back to the British, therefore, nobody looks back to anyone. But most importantly Britain is too small and unimpressive to care about. As mentioned at the beginning however, we have to make ourselves attractive to Americans. Americans, would be a attracted to a union of Norway, Britain and Germany, and then they would look back to us. The EU is too big, too pan-European and hence unattractive. Why would Americans move to and set down roots Poland or Romania? Also Americans would never be attracted to Norway on its own or Britain on its own, but together we can attract them!


“Pure gold!”

Food is to animals as gold is to humans.

5B2F5922-05A0-421B-A585-A4BBE8B1CAE5
Prospector panning for gold.

noun (parable)

  1. a short allegorical story designed to illustrate or teach some truth, religious principle, or moral lesson.
  2. a statement or comment that conveys a meaning indirectly by the use of comparison, analogy, or the like.

Parable of The Golden Lottery Winner.

Imagine if someone won the lottery and gave every last penny of it away. Is there reward in heaven for such an act? What this human did goes against every animal instinct. He or she goes against nature. This human is golden. For example, imagine if there was a man called Bob who won the £160 million jackpot on the Euromillions lottery. Imagine if Bob gave every single last penny of it away to charity and returned to normal life and work. Through Bob leading the way and setting the example, everybody on earth would be totally stress free. Nobody would ever have to worry about money ever again. It would be a miracle! To people who have lost or wasted a lot of money for example through misplacing, a bad purchase or gambling you could always say remember Bob’s example, and then they would be stress free. To someone who is greedy with seeking or earning lots of money you could always say, think of Bob’s example, and then you are all stress free. Bob would have such a very good impact on mental health. Bob could perhaps even start a new era or age and a new way of thinking. Bob would become a household name.

We’re not saying that your outer circumstances count for nothing, nor are we implying that people have to give away all their possessions to be sincere spiritual seekers. But without developing your inner resources of peace and mental stability, no amount of worldly success—whether measured in terms of wealth, fame, power, or relationships—can ever bring real satisfaction.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 23).

Despite what the quote says above, I believe to be a serious spiritual seeker you do have to give everything away, especially if you have sinned.

Parable of The Golden bird.

Imagine if some worms were stranded in the middle of a motorway, and were unable to burrow into the tarmac, and then a sparrow came along and carried every single last worm to safety from the traffic and onto the soil, instead of eating them. Is there reward in heaven for such a bird? What this bird did goes against every animal instinct. This bird goes against nature. This bird is golden.

The Golden Bird.
Parable of the Golden Bird.

Should your pursuit of happiness focus mainly on accumulating possessions and other “externals”? Or should you focus on putting your inner house in order?

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 22).

Parable of The Golden Bird.

Imagine if a chaffinch went around feeding the chicks of other birds, even other species, and not only it’s own. Is there reward in heaven for such a bird? What this bird did goes against every animal instinct. This bird goes against nature. This would be a golden bird.

The Golden Bird.
Parable of the Golden Bird.

Do the inner workings of your mind really have a greater effect on you than, say, your possessions or your surroundings? After all, big companies and advertising agencies spend billions of dollars every year trying to convince you that the opposite is true! In their eyes, your best shot at achieving happiness is to buy whatever they’re selling. They appeal to what Jon likes to call the “if only” mentality: If only you drove a fancier car, lived in a bigger house, gargled with a stronger mouthwash, and used a softer toilet paper—then you’d be truly happy. Even if you don’t believe everything advertisers tell you, don’t you believe that the external conditions of your life determine how well off you are?

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 21).

Parable of the Golden Labrador.

Imagine if a farmer had two dogs, a Golden Labrador and an Golden Retriever and every time the farmer gave the Golden Labrador a treat, the Golden Labrador, instead of devouring the treat on the spot, would go and give it straight to the Golden Retriever (without any training). What this Golden Labrador did goes against every animal instinct. This Golden Labrador goes against nature. This Golden Labrador would live up to its name.

DEE19B13-E4EB-4014-BDDB-21E8C8E20D22
Parable of the Golden Ladrador.

The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism points or thinks in the opposite or inverse direction of instincts or capitalism, because the poorer you are the more native you are.

Parable of the Rich Fool.

Someone in the crowd said to him, “Teacher, tell my brother to divide the inheritance with me.”

Jesus replied, “Man, who appointed me a judge or an arbiter between you?” Then he said to them, “Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; life does not consist in an abundance of possessions.”

And he told them this parable: “The ground of a certain rich man yielded an abundant harvest. He thought to himself, ‘What shall I do? I have no place to store my crops.’

“Then he said, ‘This is what I’ll do. I will tear down my barns and build bigger ones, and there I will store my surplus grain. And I’ll say to myself, “You have plenty of grain laid up for many years. Take life easy; eat, drink and be merry.”’

“But God said to him, ‘You fool! This very night your life will be demanded from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself?’

“This is how it will be with whoever stores up things for themselves but is not rich toward God.”

Luke 12:13-21

The parable of the rich fool.
The parable of the rich fool.

Parable of The Golden Lion.

Imagine if a lion protected lambs from a predator instead of eating them. What this lion did goes against every animal instinct. This lion goes against nature. This lion would be golden. ‪

F8B8EF0D-F71F-4174-8E45-58B33E8DEE08
Parable of the Golden Lion.

The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them.

Isaiah 11:6.

Parable of The Golden Director.

Imagine if a director ran a company not for personal profit but just to keep it ticking over and to pay his employees very handsomely indeed. What this director did goes against every animal instinct. This director goes against nature. This would be a golden director.

Parable of the Golden Scientist.

Imagine if a scientist who made smart phones was like a Buddhist or Christian monk and made smart phones not for personal profit, but just to keep the company innovative and state of the art. What this scientist did goes against every animal instinct. This scientist goes against nature. This scientist would be golden.

Parable of the Golden Doctor.

Imagine if a doctor was like a Buddhist or Christian monk and cured and saved peoples lives not for a huge salary, but just to keep in the Buddha’s Middle Way. Is there reward in heaven for such a doctor? What this doctor did goes against every animal instinct. This doctor goes against nature. This doctor is golden.

Parable of the Golden Politician.

Imagine a if far-right politician such as Nick Griffin became a full on mendicant Buddhist monk, that is renounced all of his wealth, donned the orange or crimson robes, shaved his head, promised to let go of his attachments to all social conventions, promised to keep the 5 precepts, followed the Vinaya (the rules Buddha put together for monks to follow), yet crucially was still far-right and politically active. Would anti-fascists still boo, jeer, milkshake, intimidate and beat up a Buddhist monk? Analogously, this is honestly the type of devotion, faith and sacrifice that is required from us far-right people in order to save native white people and to prove 100% our beliefs, virtues and convictions. This is what the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism is all about and requires of us.

Animals are comical.

The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism has never happened in the animal kingdom because animals, such as birds, never think about sharing food, they just go for the belly or the energy of life, that is the fats, protein and nutrients etc, without even considering another bird.

The Golden Bird.
Parable of the Golden Bird.

Give everything away.

YHWH looks out for beings or creatures that perform the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism. However, it has only happened twice in creation. If such a golden human, bird, dog or lion does not exist we are not happy or pleased. The Buddha and Jesus Christ are that golden human, bird, dog or lion. The Buddha and Jesus Christ both gave everything away, that is they won the lottery of life and gave every last penny of it away. Hence, on earth and in heaven they are both the richest men in the universe.

Golden Buddha.
Before Siddhārtha Gautama became Buddha he was the son of a king and lived a life of opulence in a palace, hidden from the miseries of the world. He then renounced his wealth and deliberately pursued poverty and practiced extreme self-mortification, almost dying of starvation in the process. Because of this Herculean sacrifice from a rich life to one of abject poverty and suffering (or inverse of deserved divinity), Siddhārtha Gautama then consequently attained nirvana and became the Buddha.

We could all be golden humans.

The Rich and the Kingdom of YHWH.

Just then a man came up to Jesus and asked, “Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?”

“Why do you ask me about what is good?” Jesus replied. “There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments.”

“Which ones?” he inquired.

Jesus replied, “‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, honor your father and mother,’ and ‘love your neighbor as yourself.’”

“All these I have kept,” the young man said. “What do I still lack?”

Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”

When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth.

Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”

Matthew 19:16-24.

When you read the above did you get cynical and wink at Jesus Christ?

Practice.

Natives and primitives do not go for the energy down here on earth or in life, whether it is food, money, gold or big fat juicy worms, we give a large percentage of our money away and we seek the energy of the afterlife. We understand that YHWH and the afterlife have absolutely zero interest in the material wealth we own down here on earth or in life. We know that we cannot purchase our rank in the kingdom of heaven with gold or money.

Wealth can’t help you. Many people spend nearly all their time and energy trying to accumulate as much money and as many possessions as they can. But all the wealth in the world can’t buy your way out of death. (“ Um, Death, why don’t you take my credit card and go buy yourself something nice?” It doesn’t work. Sorry.) Rich or poor, everyone must face it. Also, no matter how many material possessions you’ve acquired, you can’t take even the smallest particle with you. In fact, attachment to your belongings only makes letting go at the time of death more difficult.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 224).

A reason to be charitable.

Is there reward in heaven for giving all of your money away? Jesus Christ said the following:

“Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal. For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

Matthew 6:19-21.

The Golden Bird.
Parable of the Golden Bird.

What would you do?

Your close ones would never forgive you for giving all of your money away down here on earth, such as your family, relatives, children and friends etc. However, the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism determines there is a reason to be charitable and that we should never pursue money or riches and that we should never play the lottery or fantasise about winning it.


The ancients Israelites always believed poverty was a noble virtue and had the moral of the wiseman and the rich man. For example:

The Rich Man and Lazarus.

“There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.

“The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. In Hades, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’

“But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’

“He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my family, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’

“Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’

“‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’

“He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’”

Luke 16:19-31.

57B5D6F1-BDD5-4E25-A9CF-1A029C7AC12E
Jesus Christ risen from the dead.

“But woe to you who are rich, for you have already received your comfort. Woe to you who are well fed now, for you will go hungry. Woe to you who laugh now, for you will mourn and weep. Woe to you when everyone speaks well of you, for that is how their ancestors treated the false prophets.

Luke 6:24-26.


My example, thus far.

Do not say that you are poor, say that you are native, as poor has several meanings, one which means a lack of wealth, as in ‘I am poor’, another means bad quality or lack of skill, as in ‘poor workmanship’, and another means unfortunate, as ‘poor Bill fell down.’ If you ever get down to a oneaire or tenaire, definitely say that you are native and get religious and quote Jesus Christ’s teachings about money. It is actually quite hard to get down to a oneaire or tenaire, money usually comes back within a few days, so we are not oneaires or tenaires for very long. However, it is still worth doing for a short time. It takes planning to get down to a oneaire or tenaire and should be timed so that money comes back soon and done carefully. I have found that being a hundredaire, say owning around £500 and then giving £100 away to a good cause is a very comfortable middle way. I have also been a tenaire and given £20 away to a good cause, but this is more like asceticism. Since April/May 2019, I have given away a total of £140 to a good cause, but I have only been practicing the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism since then. I will try to do much better in future by giving a larger percentage away and I will update.

The Cave of Altamira. Cave painting of auroch. 36000 BP.
The Cave of Altamira. Cave painting of auroch. 36000 BP.

Native poverty.

If you look at us lower classes with the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism, you resist the thoughts of ‘scum, scaff and chav’ and see us for what we really are, impressive natives and primitives.

Not many have humbled themselves more than white South Africans, and there has been no greater sacrifice made than the 400,000 poor white squatters in South Africa.

On earth the rich are famous and illustrious, and therefore because we do not and cannot ever know the names of all the lower class down here on earth but only in heaven, hence hallowed be your name and on earth as in heaven is also for the lower class.

The poor you will always have with you, but you will not always have me.

Matthew 26:11.

I am not saying we should look at or give to the poor in a Christian way, as Christianity does not work that way, but nativism and primitivism do. There is an etymological and ideological connection between nativity and nativism.

“Watch out! Don’t do your good deeds publicly, to be admired by others, for you will lose the reward from your Father in heaven. When you give to someone in need, don’t do as the hypocrites do—blowing trumpets in the synagogues and streets to call attention to their acts of charity! I tell you the truth, they have received all the reward they will ever get. But when you give to someone in need, don’t let your left hand know what your right hand is doing. Give your gifts in private, and your Father, who sees everything, will reward you.

Matthew 6:1-4.


The Widow’s offering.

As Jesus was sitting opposite the treasury, He watched the crowd putting money into it. And many rich people put in large amounts. Then one poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, which amounted to a small fraction of a denarius.

Jesus called His disciples to Him and said, “Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put more than all the others into the treasury. For they all contributed out of their surplus, but she out of her poverty has put in all she had to live on.”

Luke 21:1-4

Jesus and His disciples watch a widow put coins into the treasury offering box.
Jesus and His disciples watch a widow put coins into the treasury offering box.

Life and survival.

Bill Gates is the richest man in the world, and is known among many other things as a philanthropist. Bill Gates has a net worth of $105 billion dollars, hence even if he gave away $104 billion dollars to charity he would still be a billionaire. Giving $104 billion dollars away does not affect or threaten Bill Gate’s life and survival in any way at all. He would still not have to worry about food or bills etc. This is what Jesus Christ meant by “For they all contributed out of their surplus.” However, when the lower class or the poor give away money to charity, even though it is infinitely smaller than $104 billion dollars, you can be rest assured it has really hurt them and has seriously threatened their life and survival. This is because they are probably only hundredaires, tenaires or even oneaires. This is what Jesus Christ meant by “Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put more than all the others into the treasury“ and “but she out of her poverty has put in all she had to live on.” Even though you are poor, get charitable. For example, imagine if a homeless person had £4 to his/her name and went and give it all to another homeless person. That is the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism. That is what YHWH looks out for. The rich and famous, such as actors and singers are very charitable “out of their surplus”, but it is never a threat to their social status, never mind their life and survival. The lower class and poor do not want to be beaten by rich superstars when it comes to charity.

Give, even if you only have a little.

(The Buddha, Dhammapada, verse 224).

Is life and survival is a struggle for you? Then know that you are more native than those whose life and survival is not a struggle. You will be rewarded in heaven. The harder life is for you, the more native you are, as in Palaeolithic and Mesolithic man, who were purely native to their environments.

Mesolithic man.
Mesolithic man.

Animals do not have money yet they still live and survive, similarly natives and primitives like Palaeolithic man did not even comprehend the meaning of money or currency. Prehistoric men had no money yet they still lived and survived. The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism is without sin because it pays every single last penny, it is absolutely nothing. Imagine the possessions of a Palaeolithic man. Similarly natives and primitives do not care about money. Why be a business man or woman and rip-off people to make money for yourself? Why be a highflier and make money for someone else? Why be rich at all? Why keep up appearances? Why have social classes? Why compete with peers or old school friends? Why always look or point to the rich, elite, famous and upper classes? Why compete with colleagues for the top position and higher wage? The top is the bottom and bottom is the top. Remember, we do not want to be like the Ancient Romans, measuring people’s value, worth, honour, respect and esteem by their wealth.


Capitalism.

Liberal democracies and especially western capitalist governments will never teach you the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism, because they are secular and capitalist. But religion does. Western governments are all about wealth and making you rich, they are driven by economic growth and profits and they literally educate you from birth to go for the maximum wage and to save up as much money as possible.

Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position. Do not be conceited.

Romans 12:16.

Panel of the lions.
Panel of the lions, Chauvet Cave, France, 32000 BP.

The Middle Way.

How can we give every last penny away? Just do it and walk out the door? Will YHWH provide? What about food? What about my phone? The Buddha taught the Noble Eightfold Path as the Middle Way of moderation, between the extremes of sensual indulgence and self-mortification.

In the time of the Buddha (and in the traditions that continued to adhere to the full monastic code—the vinaya), monks and nuns were prohibited from handling or soliciting money and were allowed to own just a few simple belongings, which included items like several robes, a bowl, a razor, and an umbrella for protection from the sun. They took vows of celibacy, ate only before noon, and received their food from laypeople, either during alms rounds or through offerings brought to the monastery. The point of these regulations wasn’t to cause hardship or suffering; in fact, the Buddha’s approach was known as the “middle way” between asceticism (severe restrictions in the comforts of life) and materialism. Instead, the point was to free the monastics to dedicate their life to practice and teaching.

(Buddhism For Dummies, Jonathan Landaw, Stephen Bodian, Gudrun Bühnehmann, page 135).

The Buddha practicing self mortification (before he realised the middle way).
Pursuing enlightenment, Buddha first practiced severe asceticism before recommending a non-ascetic middle way. The Buddha deserved divinity because of his Great Renunciation of wealth and his almost dying of starvation.

Capitalism educates you that you need to save up more and more and that you need as much as possible. Like the golden parables, I am trying to point or think in the opposite or inverse direction of capitalism or instincts. I am deliberately maintaining hundredaire status. The most native and primitive people of the world are not even thousandaires, hence, I am comfortably a hundredaire. However, occasionally and briefly I am not even a tenaire, but a oneaire.

Francis of Assisi.
In Christianity, Francis of Assisi and his followers practiced extreme acts of asceticism. His sanctity was based first and foremost on his deliberate pursuit of poverty.

The Last penny.

The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism is without sin because it pays every single last penny, this is because natives or primitives such as bushmen or prehistoric man are/were literally penniless.

Truly I tell you, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny.

Matthew 5:26.

The last penny.
The last penny.

When Jesus Christ spoke this was he being metaphorical or literal?

Therefore, is it ‘scum, scaff and chav’ to literally possess not a single penny?

Or is it without sin?

Daily bread.

Therefore, we have the literal and material Lord’s Prayer. Daily bread is all you need, that is you do not need riches to be in the kingdom of heaven. That is what Jesus Christ meant.

Feeding of the 5000.
Feeding of the 5000.

The problem.

If you think about it, what can any one person (such as a politician) do to save native white people? Apart from most not wanting to, it is impossible! We cannot do anything. No one person can single-handedly do anything, not even the Queen can say or do anything to save native white people. As soon as you open your mouth you would be called a racist and booed and jeered and milkshaked. You would sacrifice absolutely everything you own, including all of your money, your career and your reputation.

The solution.

Because the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism points or thinks in the opposite or inverse direction of capitalism or instincts, therefore it determines that in order to save native white people, (for which there can be no greater glory), then we all as individuals (such as politicians) must bravely sacrifice absolutely everything that we own, including all of our money, our career and our reputation.

Egoism.

The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism determines that far-left politicians such as David Cameron, Jeremy Corbyn and Boris Johnson etc are nothing more than egotistic cowards, because they sell out and betray their own country and people while simultaneously carving out elite careers, high standards of living, fame and vast wealth and riches for themselves.

Altruism.

The inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism determines that far-right politicians such as Nick Griffin, Adam Walker, Jayda Fransen, Paul Golding and Tommy Robinson etc are altruistic heroes because they try to save their own country and people, while simultaneously deliberately carving out normal careers, lower standards of living, unpopularity and moderate wealth and even poverty for themselves.

The theory also determines that the only reason average and normal people avoid and do not vote for far-right parties such as the BNP, is because such parties and their members, suffer, are unpopular and are poor.

“If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first.”

John 15:18.

Ignorance.

Imagine if white Americans evolved all of a sudden to some higher state and then generally began to lose the desire to want to miscegenate with Europeans or Britons. That has got to be a bloody awful feeling! To know that somebody does not want to miscegenate with you. The British do not understand this feeling. The British know that everyone wants to miscegenate with them. That is what it feels like to be white. However, that is how some non-white people feel. That is they know that white people do not want to miscegenate with them. You know that you do not need me to tell you that and it is not racism. It is never personal either.

Anti-Semitism.

By accepting that the Biblical Land (the Nile Valley) is the kingdom of YHWH that Jesus Christ referred to in the Lord’s Prayer it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the inverse of deserved divinity of nativism and primitivism does not even go there concerning anti-Semitism. If you do Egypt you do Israel. If you go one further than Israel and fully accept the Nile Valley into the European fold or sphere then you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are never anti-Semitic.

Holocaust.

The Holocaust determines that all white people should be golden humans, but this does not mean we have to be anti-racist, do miscegenation, be subservient to non-native people or hand our countries over to Asians or Africans. It simply means we have to give away a lot of our money.

Did Jesus Christ not suffer, die on the cross and resurrect from the dead for the forgiveness of sins and to guarantee that the kingdom of YHWH would come on earth as in heaven, and that the power and glory would be ours forever. Amen?

Our Father, which art in heaven,

Hallowed be thy Name;

Thy kingdom come;

Thy will be done

in earth, as it is in heaven:

Give us this day our daily bread;

And forgive us our trespasses,

as we forgive them that trespass against us;

And lead us not into temptation,

But deliver us from evil:

For thine is the kingdom,

the power, and the glory,

For ever and ever.

Amen.